Production of blockboard from small athel slats end-glued by different type of joint

  • Morteza Nazerian
  • Vahid Moazami
  • Rahim Mohebi Gargari
Keywords: Beech, bending strength, blockboard panel, end to end half lap joint, Fir, melamine-urea formaldehyde, Oak


This study evaluated the effect of joint type of short athel (Tamarix aphila) slats at three levels (butt joint, mitered joint, and half lap joint) in core layer veneer consisting of three wood species (Fir, Beech, and Oak). The joints were glued with PVAc and sandwiched by veneers with different ratios of melamine formaldehyde/urea formaldehyde resin (0:100, 25:75, and 50:50) in glue line to determine the modulus of rupture in dry and wet conditions. It was found that the highest dry and wet modulus of rupture was obtained in specimens having slats jointed with half lap joint veneered with fir by using MF/UF ratio of 50:50. The maximum modulus of rupture parallel to the face/back veneer grain value in dry condition (83.40 MPa) was observed to be higher than those values of modulus of rupture perpendicular to the face/back veneer grain (65MPa). However, the maximum modulus of rupture parallel to the face/back veneer grain value (53MPa) in wet condition were observed to be smaller than those values of modulus of rupture perpendicular to the face/back veneer grain value (56MPa).


Laufenberg, T.; Ayrilmis, N.; White, R. 2006. Fire and bending properties of blockboard with fire retardant treated veneers. Holz als Roh-und Werkstoff 64: 137-143.

Laufenberg, T. 1982. Exposure effects upon performance of laminated veneer lumber and glulam materials. Forest Products Journal 32(5): 42–8.

Colak, S.; Colakoglu, G.; Aydin, I. 2007. Effects of log steaming, veneer drying and aging on the mechanical properties of laminated veneer lumber (LVL). Building Environment 42: 93-98.

Hing, P.S.; Paridah, M.T.; Zakiah, A. 2005. Edgewise bending properties of LVL: effects of veneer thickness and specie In: The proceeding of USM-JIRCAS joint international symposium, lignocelluloses material of the millennium. 3–5 April. 2005. Washington State University, Washington, USA, p. 3–14.

Wang, X.; Ross, R.J.; Brashaw, B.K.; Verhey, S.A.; Formsan, J.W.; Ericson, J.R. 2003. Flexural Properties of laminated veneer lumber manufactured from ultrasonically rated red maple veneer. Forest Products Laboratory 2003; FPL-RN-0288.

Ozcifci, A. 2007. Effects of scarf joints on bending strength and modulus of elasticity to laminated veneer lumber (LVL). Building Environment 42:1510-1514.

Nazerian, M. 2013. The lamination influence on properties of agro-based particleboard. Wood Material Science and Engineering 8(2): 129-138.

River, B.H. 1994. Fracture of adhesive-bonded wood joints. Pizzi, A. and Mittal, K.L. eds. Handbook of adhesive technology. New York Marcel Dekker, Inc. pp 151-177.

Kapica, L. 1986. Glulam elements for upholstered furniture frames. Holztechnologie 27(3): 127-129.

Vick, C.B. 1999. Wood handbook—Wood as an engineering material. Chapter 9, Adhesive Bonding of Wood Materials. Forest Products Laboratory. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. 1999; 463 p.

Taghiyari, H.R.; Ghofrani, M.; Ghamsari, F.A. 2017. Effects of adhesive and loading directions on the load-carrying capacity of V-nails. Maderas-Cienc Tecnol 19(1): 113-129.

Kumar, V.S.K.; Sharma, C.M.; Gupta, S. 2015. Compression and flexural properties of finger jointed mango wood sections. Maderas-Cienc Tecnol 17(1): 151-160.

Norvydas, V.; Minelga, D. 2006. Strength and stiffness properties of furniture panels covered with different coatings. Material Science 12(4): 328-332.

Nemli, G.; Kalaycioglu, H.; Alp, A. 2001. Suitability of date palm (Phoenix dactyliferia) branches for particleboard production. Holz als Roh und Werkstoff 59(6): 411-412.

Moazami, V.; Nazerian, M. 2014. Effect of Joint type in core layer and wood species veneer on surface layers on mechanical properties of blockboard. Iranian Journal of Forest and Wood Products 68(3): 573-590 (in Persian).

Morrell, J.J. 2002. Wood-based composites: what have we learned? International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation 49: 253–258.

Tuttle, M.T. 2003. Structural Analysis of Polymeric Composite Materials. 2nd ed. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, Florida. 647pp.

Winandy, J.E., Rowell, R. 2005. Chemistry of wood strength. In: Rowell R (ed) Handbook of wood chemistry and wood composites. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton London New York Singapore, pp 303–347