Shading the glass façade: textile membrane strategies for early-stage design for office building energy-efficiency in hot–humid climates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22320/07190700.2026.16.01.08Keywords:
energy saving, fully glazed façade, textile membrane shading, dynamic shading, day lighting, hot and humidAbstract
In India's hot and humid climate, the prevalence of fully glazed multi-story (FGM) office structures results in higher energy use, primarily due to solar heat ingress through their extensive glass surfaces. While external shading is a well-known solution, designers often lack clarity on which shading type and, specifically, which material performs best during the critical early design stages. This study employs a simulation-based comparative framework to evaluate the integration of sustainable textile membranes across three distinct shading configurations: fixed solar screen, fixed diagrid, and dynamic shading. Using a representative, fully glazed, multi-storied office building model located in Chennai, the research employed Autodesk Revit for modeling, E-Quest for energy analysis, and Dynamo for parametric setup to conduct a multi-objective analysis. The procedures involved quantifying annual cooling loads to assess thermal performance, measuring Useful Daylight Illuminance (UDI) to evaluate visual comfort, and performing an Initial investment cost of the integrated shading devices to determine the economic payback period for each system compared to a non-shaded base case. Comparative analysis demonstrates the potential for considerable energy savings across all options. However, findings revealed pronounced disparities and contradictory trends between thermal and visual performance. Notably, the fixed solar screen emerged as the most effective solution, balancing energy reduction with economic viability. The study concludes that material-driven simulations are essential in the early design phase to enable well-informed choices that align sustainability with building performance.
Downloads
References
AHMED, E.B. (2021). Utilizing dynamic shading system to achieve daylight performance according to LEED standards V.4: case study, university classrooms in Egypt. HBRC Journal, 17(1), 177-200. http://doi.org/10.1080/16874048.2021.1920138
ALHMOUD, S.H., & ALHMOUD, H.H. (2024). Analysis of thermal comfort techniques for the performance conserving of buildings and interior spaces. International journal of sustainable development & planning, 19(11), 4193-4201. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.191109
AL-MASRANI, S.M., & AL-OBAIDI, K. M. (2019). Dynamic shading systems: A review of design parameters, platforms and evaluation strategies. Automation in construction, 102, 195-216. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.01.014
ARUMUGAM, P., & RAMALINGAM, V. (2024). Thermal comfort enhancement of office buildings located under warm and humid climate through phase change material and insulation coupled with natural ventilation. Sustainable energy technologies and assessments, 63, 103657. http://doi.org/10.1016/J.SETA.2024.103657
BAROZZI, M, LIENHARD, J., ZANELLI, A., & MONTICELLI, C. (2016). The Sustainability of Adaptive Envelopes: Developments of Kinetic Architecture. Procedia Engineering, 155, 275-284. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.029
BHATIA, A., DONTU, S., GARG, V., & SINGH, R. (2024). Approach for energy efficient building design during early phase of design process. Energy Informatics, 7(1), 122. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42162-024-00426-z
BRAKE, T. M. (2011). Understanding Steel Design: An Architectural Design Manual. Birkhäuser
CARLETTI, C., SCIURPI, F., & PIERANGIOLI, L. (2014). The Energy Upgrading of Existing Buildings: Window and Shading Device Typologies for Energy Efficiency Refurbishment. Sustainability, 6(8), 5354-5377. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6085354
CHOCKALINGAM, C. (2021). Envelope Performance Analysis of Office Buildings in Warm and Humid Climate: From Case Studies of Multi-storied Office Buildings in Chennai. In K. Thirumaran, G. Balaji, N.D. Prasad (eds) Sustainable Urban Architecture (vol. 114). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9585-1
CHI, D. A., MORENO, D., & NAVARRO, J. (2018). Impact of perforated solar screens on daylight availability and low energy use in offices. Advances in Building Energy Research, 15(1), 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512549.2018.1550439
CHIDIAC, S.E., CATANIA, E.J.C., MOROFSKY, E. & FOO, S. (2011). Effectiveness of single and multiple energy retrofit measures on the energy consumption of office buildings. Energy, 36(8), 5037-5052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.05.050
CIAMPI, G., SPANODIMITRIOU, Y., NOCENTE, A., SCORPIO, M., & SIBILIO, S. (2022). Energy performances of tensile material in building renovation in the Nordic region. E3S Web of Conferences, 362, 05003. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202236205003
COAKLEY, D., RAFTERY, P., & KEANE, M. (2014). A review of methods to match building energy simulation models to measured data. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 37, 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.007
COMITTI, A., VIJAYAKUMARAN, H., NEJABATMEIMANDI, M. H., SEIXAS, L., CABELLO, A., MISSERONI, D., PENESA, M., PAECH, C., BESSA, M., BOWN, A.C. DAL CORSO, F., & BOSI, F. (2024). Ultralight membrane structures toward a sustainable environment. In A. Bahrami (eds) Estructuras y edificios sostenibles (pp. 17-37). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46688-5_2
Dynamo. (n.d.). Dynamo forum. http://dynamobim.com
GARCÍA-MARTÍN, G., CAMPANO, M. Á., ACOSTA, I., & BUSTAMANTE, P. (2025). New approaches in dynamic metrics for lighting control systems: A critical review. Applied sciences, 15(15), 8243. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158243
GONÇALVES, M., FIGUEIREDO, A., ALMEIDA, R.M.S.F., & VICENTE, R. (2024). Dynamic façades in buildings: A systematic review across thermal comfort, energy efficiency and daylight performance. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 199, 114474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114474
HWANG, R.-L., & CHEN, W.-A. (2022). Creating glazed facades performance map based on energy and thermal comfort perspective for office building design strategies in Asian hot-humid climate zone. Applied Energy, 311, 118689 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118689
IRS (2022). Yearly average exchange rates for Indian Rupee to US $. https://www.irs.gov/individuals/international-taxpayers/yearly-average-currency-exchange-rates
KIRIMTAT, A., & MANIOĞLU, G. (2024). A simulation-based performance evaluation of new generation dynamic shading devices with multi-objective optimization. Journal of Building Engineering, 90, 109322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109322
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory – James J. Hirsch & Associates. (2009). DOE- 2.2 Building Energy Use and Cost Analysis Program. Volume 4: Libraries & Report. March 2009. James J. Hirsch
MALATJI, E.M., ZHANG, J., & XIA, X. (2013). A multiple objective optimisation model for building energy efficiency investment decision. Energy and Buildings, 61, 81–87. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.01.042
MOLLAERT, M. & DE LAET, L. (2017). Novel Structural Skins: Improving sustainability and efficiency through new structural textile materials and designs – COST Action. Impact, 2017(5), 46-48. http://doi.org/10.21820/23987073.2017.5.46
MURTA, A. (2015). GPC: General Polygon Clipper library, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1512.006. SciX Transition Resource. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ascl.soft12006M
Natural Resources Defense Council [NRDC] & Administrative Staff College of India [ASCI]. (2014). Transforming Cities: Building Efficiency Lessons from Hyderabad. https://tgredco.telangana.gov.in/PDFs/ECBC/6_Transforming_Cities_Building_Efficiency_Lessons.pdf
NURAZZI, N.M., ASYRAF, M.R.M., KHALINA, A., ABDULLAH, N., AISYAH, H.A., RAFIQAH, S.A., SABARUDDIN, F.A., KAMARUDIN, S.H., NORRRAHIM, M.N.F., ILYAS, R.A., & SAPUAN, S.M. (2021). A Review on Natural Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composite for Bullet Proof and Ballistic Applications. Polymers, 13(4), 646. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13040646
PROCACCINI, G., PRIETO, A., KNAACK, U., MONTICELLI, C., & KONSTANTINOU, T. (2024). Textile membrane for façade retrofitting: exploring fabric potentialities for the development of innovative strategies. Buildings, 14(1), 86. http://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14010086
S. A. Industries BEC, (2014). Stamisol FT 381. http://www.bec.es/en/fabrics-for-curtains-blinds-screens-and-textil-architecture/textile-meshes/stamisol-ft-381
SÃO JOÃO, L., CARVALHO, R., & FANGUEIRO, R. (2016). A Study on the Durability Properties of Textile Membranes for Architectural Purposes. Procedia Engineering, 155, 230-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.024
SAWYER, A. O., NAVVAB, M., WEISSMAN, D., & GUANZHOU, J. (2022). Facade photometry: Linking annual daylight performance to facade design. Buildings, 12(10), 1556. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101556
Serge Ferrari group. (n.d.a) Projects Serge Ferrari.https://www.sergeferrari.com/us-en/references/largest-textile-facade-netherlands-serge-ferrari
Serge Ferrari group. (n.d.b). Tenseo. Frontiside 381. https://www.sergeferrari.com/en-nz/productsfrontside-range/frontside-view-381
SHI, X., TABLADA, A., & WANG, L. (2020). Influence of two motion types on solar transmittance and daylight performance of dynamic façades. Solar Energy, 201, 561-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.03.017
SOROOSHNIA, E., RAHNAMAYIEZEKAVAT, P., RASHIDI, M., SADEGHI, M., & SAMALI, B. (2023). Passive intelligent kinetic external dynamic shade design for improving indoor comfort and minimizing energy consumption. Buildings, 13(4), 1090. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13041090
TensiNet. (n.d.). https://www.tensinet.com/index.php
THALFELDT, M., KURNITSKI, J. & VOLL, H. (2015). Comparison of Simplified and Detailed Window Models in Office Building Energy Simulations. Energy Procedia, 78, 2076-2081. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.235
TIAN, G-J., FAN, Y-S., ZHANG, X., WANG, H., XIE, W., & PENG, K. (2020). Analysis of solar radiation heat transfer of architectural fabric membrane material. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558925020911005
Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission [TNERC]. (2017). Determination of Tariff for Generation and
Distribution. Order in T.P. No.1 of 2017 DT:11.08.2017. Government of Tamilnadu. https://tecaonline.in/pdfupload/Files/TNERC%20Tariff%20Order-TANGEDCO%20dtd-11-08-2017.pdf
WANG, J., HUANG, X., WANG, W., HAN, H., DUAN, H., YU, S., & ZHU, M. (2022). Effects of PTFE coating modification on tribological properties of PTFE/aramid self-lubricating fabric composite. Materials Research Express, 9(5), 055302. http://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ac587a
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Chandrasekaran Chockalingam, Madhu Mathi Anbu, Mase Noguchi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The content of articles which are published in each edition of Habitat Sustentable, is the exclusive responsibility of the author(s) and does not necessarily represent the thinking or compromise the opinion of University of the Bio-Bio.
The author(s) conserve their copyright and guarantee to the journal, the right of first publication of their work. This will simultaneously be subject to the Creative Commons Recognition License CC BY-SA, which allows others to share-copy, transform or create new materials from this work for non-commercial purposes, as long as they recognize authorship and the first publication in this journal, and its new creations are under a license with the same terms.









Scientific Information Program/Concurso Fondos de Publicación de Revistas Científicas 2018/ Proyecto Mejoramiento de Visibilidad de Revistas UBB (Código:FP180007).




