Public opinion on government performance after a natural disaster: Some reflections on Latin America
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22320/hem.v20i2.5177Keywords:
natural disasters, government performance, public opinion, Latin AmericaAbstract
This essay uses the EM-DAT database and individual-level data from AmericasBarometer survey to characterize the citizen assessment on government performance after a natural disaster in Latin America. The analysis shows that the death toll and damages due to natural disasters occurred in the last six decades have been mainly provoked by earthquakes, floods, droughts, and hurricanes. In turn, the likelihood of vulnerability in the aftermath of natural disasters is higher than 60%, exhibits a downward trend, and is heterogenous among Latin American countries. Finally, Latin American public opinion assigns itself a larger responsibility regarding government for the occurrence of climatological- and hydrological-related disasters.
References
Achen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M. (2004). Blind retrospection: Electoral responses to drought, flu, and shark attacks. Princeton University, unpublished manuscript.
Ashworth, S., Bueno de Mesquita, E., & Friedenberg, A. (2018). Learning about voter rationality. American Journal of Political Science, 62(1), 37–54.
Cassar, A., Healy, A., & Von Kessler, C. (2017). Trust, risk, and time preferences after a natural disaster: Experimental evidence from Thailand. World Development, 94, 90–105.
EM-DAT. (2021a). EM-DAT guidelines: Data entry, field description/definition. Recuperado el 2 de diciembre de 2021, de https://public.emdat.be/about.
EM-DAT. (2021b). The CRED/OFDA International Disaster Database. Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. Recuperado el 2 de diciembre de 2021, de https://public.emdat.be.
Fleming, D. A., Chong, A., & Bejarano, H. D. (2014). Trust and reciprocity in the aftermath of natural disasters. The Journal of Development Studies, 50(11), 1482–1493.
Hommerich, C. (2012). Trust and subjective well-being after the Great East Japan earthquake, tsunami and nuclear meltdown: Preliminary results. International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 21(1), 46–64.
Kahn, M. E. (2005). The death toll from natural disasters: The role of income, geography, and institutions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(2), 271–284.
LAPOP (2017). 2016/17 AmericasBarometer Round Survey: Data files and notes. Recuperado el 6 de abril de 2021, de http://datasets.americasbarometer.org/database
LAPOP (2019). 2018/19 AmericasBarometer Round Survey: Data files and notes. Recuperado el 6 de abril de 2021, de
http://datasets.americasbarometer.org/database
LAPOP. (2021). AmericasBarometer weighting scheme, 2011. Recuperado el 22 de septiembre de 2021, de https://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/survey-designs.php.
Liang. Y. (2016). Trust in Chinese government and quality of life (QOL) of Sichuan earthquake survivors: Does trust in government help to promote QOL? Social Indicators Research, 127(2), 541–564.
OCHA (2020). Natural disasters in Latin America and the Caribbean, 2000-2019. Recuperado el 30 de noviembre de 2021, de https://reliefweb.int/report/world/naturaldisasters-latin-america-and-caribbean-2000-2019.
Quiroz, A., & Smith, A. (2013). Leading survival and natural disaster. British Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 821–843.
Thoresen, S., Birkeland, M. S., Wentzel-Larsen, T., & Blix, I. (2018). Loss of trust may never heal. Institutional trust in disaster victims in a long-term perspective: Associations with social support and mental health. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–10.
Toya, H., & Skidmore, M. (2014). Do natural disasters enhance societal trust? Kyklos, 67(2), 255–279.
Valdivieso, P., & Andersson, K. P. (2017). Local politics of environmental disaster risk management: Institutional analysis and lessons from Chile. The Journal of Environment & Development, 26(1), 51–81.
Valdivieso, P., & Villena-Roldán, B. (2014). Opening the black box of social capital formation. The American Political Science Review, 108(1), 121–143.
