Glulam bonding quality of chromated copper arsenate treatment applied to Pinus elliottii wood and three structural adhesives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22320/s0718221x/2025.21Keywords:
Adhesive bonding, Chromated Copper Arsenate, delamination, Glued Laminated Timber, Glue line shear, Pinus elliottii, preservative treatmentAbstract
Glued laminated timber is an alternative gaining prominence in the Brazilian construction field. As a result, industries seek ways to improve the quality of their products, focusing on the wood used, the adhesive, and the manufacturing process. The aims of this study are to evaluate the effect of the preservative treatment chromated copper arsenate (CCA) as a preservative treatment on the gluing quality of Pinus elliottii (slash pine) glued laminated timber (Glulam) elements. For this purpose, Glulam was compared with and without CCA treatment, using Cascophen RS 216 -M, Jowat 686,60 and AG 101 adhesives to bond the laminated wood specimens. The glue quality was evaluated through delamination and shear strength tests of the glue lines based on the test method, following the European standard. The delamination results indicated that there were no significant differences between those obtained for the combinations of wood treated with CCA and wood in natura. The results of the shear tests on the glue lines revealed significant differences when comparing the performance of wood treated with CCA to that of untreated (in natura) wood. Specifically, when using Cascophen 216-M and polyurethane AG 101 adhesives, the treated wood demonstrated notably different shear strengths. This indicates that the preservative treatment with chromated copper arsenate alters the bonding effectiveness of these adhesives, highlighting the importance of selecting appropriate adhesive formulations for treated wood to ensure optimal bonding quality. The only species/adhesive combination that showed a delamination limit lower than 4 % was the one that considered natural wood glued with Cascophen 216-M adhesive. To confirm these results is essential a complementary study evaluating the viscosity of the resins used.
Downloads
References
Alade, A.A.; Naghizadeh, Z.; Wessels, C.B.; Tyhoda, L. 2021. A review of the effects of wood preservative impregnation on adhesive bonding and joint performance. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology 36(15): 1593-1617. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2021.1981651 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2021.1981651
Almeida, A.S.; Crisculo, G.; Almeida, T.H.; Christoforo, A.L.; Chahud, E.; Branco, L.A. M.N.; Pinheiro, R.V.; Lahr, F.A.R. 2019. Influence of CCA-A preservative on physical-mechanical properties of Brazilian tropical woods. BioResources 14(2): 3031-3041. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.14.2.3031-3041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.14.2.3031-3041
ASTM. 2019. Standard Practice for Establishing Structural Grades and Related Allowable Properties for Visually Graded Lumber ASTM. ASTM D245-19. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, EUA.
Andrade, C. R.; Dias-Júnior, A. F.; Brito, J. O.; Lana, A. Q.; Guimarães-Junior, J. B.; Faria, D. L. 2020. Evaluation of contamination of wooden residue sources by human activities. Scientia Forestalis 48(128). e3161. https://doi.org/10.18671/scifor.v48n128.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18671/scifor.v48n128.05
Azambuja, M.A.; Dias, A.A. 2006. Use of Castor Oil-based Polyurethane Adhesive in the Production of Glued Laminated Timber Beams. Materials Research 9(3): 1- 5. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392006000300008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392006000300008
ABNT 1997. Projeto de estruturas de madeira. ABNT NBR 7190. ABNT: Rio de Janeiro – RJ.
ABNT. 2022. Métodos de ensaio para corpos de prova isentos de defeitos para madeiras de florestas nativas ABNT NBR 7190-3. ABNT: Rio de Janeiro - RJ..
ABNT. 2009. Eucalypt treated round wood for rural constructions - Requirements. ABNT NBR 9480. ABNT: Rio de Janeiro – RJ.
Bockel, S.; Mayer, I.; Konnerth, J.; Harling, S.; Niemz, P.; Swaboda, C.; Beyer, M.; Bieri, N.; Weiland, G.; Pichelin, F. 2019. The role of wood extractives in structural hardwood bonding and their influence on different adhesive systems. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 91: 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.03.001
Brito, F.M.S.; Paes, J.B.; Oliveira, J.T. da S.; Arantes, M.D.C.; Vidaurre, G.B.; Brocco, V.F. 2018. Physico-mechanical characterization of heat-treated glued laminated bamboo. Construction and Building Materials 190: 719-727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.057
CEN. 2013. Timber structures: Glued laminated timber and glued solid timber - requirements. EN 14080. EN: Brussels - Belgium, .
Dias, A.M.; Martins, C.E.J.; Dias, A.M.P.G. 2020. Influence of the Treatment Phase on the Gluing Performance of Glued Laminated Timber. BioResources 15(3): 5725-5736. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.15.3.5725-5736 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.15.3.5725-5736
Freitas, R.R.; Molina, J.C.; Calil-Júnior, C. 2010. Mathematical model for timber decay in contact with the ground adjusted for the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Materials Research 13(2): 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392010000200006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392010000200006
Lima, P.A.F.; Gouveia, F.N.; Baraúna, E.E.P.; Sette Jr, C.R. 2020. CCB retention and penetration in Eucalyptus fence posts in function of condition of preservative treatment, Floresta 50(2). e1345. https://doi.org/10.5380/rf.v50i2.63737 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/rf.v50i2.63737
Molina, J.C.; Calil-Júnior, C.; Freitas, R.R. 2011. Mathematical model to estimate of the deterioration of wooden poles in contact with soil used in rural areas. Engenharia Agrícola 31(5): 1015-1026. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162011000500019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162011000500019
Motta, J.P.; Oliveira, J.T.D.S.; Paes, J.B.; Alves, R.C.; Vidaurre, G.B. 2014. Evaluation of the shear strength of bonded joints of teak wood (Tectona grandis). Scientia Forestalis 42(104): 615-621. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3697.6169
Musah, M.; Wang, X.; Dickinson, Y.; Ross, R.J.; Rudnicki, M.; Xie, X. 2021. Durability of the adhesive bond in cross-laminated northern hardwoods and softwoods. Construction and Building Materials 307. e124267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124267 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124267
Oliveira, C.A.B.; Silva, J.V.F.; Bianchi, N.A.; Campos, C.I.; Oliveira, K.A.; Galdino, D. S.; Bertolini, M.S.; Morais, C.A.G.; De-Souza, A.J.D.; Molina, J.C. 2020. Influence of Indian cedar particle pretreatments on cement-wood composite properties. BioResources 15(1): 1656-1664. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.15.1.1656-1664 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.15.1.1656-1664
Petrauski, S.M.F.C.; Silva, J. de C.; Petrauski, A.; Lucia, R.M.D. 2016. Analysis of Eucalyptus glued-laminated timber porticos structural performance. Revista Árvore 40(5): 931-939. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-67622016000500017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-67622016000500017
Poleto, S.F.S.; Aquino, V.B. de M.; Chahud, E.; Pinheiro, R.V.; Branco, L.A.M.N.; Silva, D.A.L.; De-Campos, C.I.; Molina, J.C.; De-Carvalho, C.M.; Christoforo, A.L.; Lahr, F. A.R. 2020. Evaluation of CCB-preserved medium density particleboards under natural weathering. BioResources 15(2):3678-3687. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.15.2.3678-3687 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.15.2.3678-3687
Samani, A.; Ganguly, S.; Kanyal, R.; Tripathi, S. 2019. Effect of microwave pre-treatment on preservative retention and treatability of Melia composita wood. Journal of Forest Science 65(10): 391-396. https://doi.org/10.17221/39/2019-JFS DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/39/2019-JFS
Stringari, E.H.; Petrauski, A.; Petrauski, S.M. C.; Azevedo, R.L.; Savaris, G. 2020. Construction and testing of glued laminated timber frames for use in laying poultry houses. Engenharia Agrícola 40(2):122-131. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v40n2p122-131/2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v40n2p122-131/2020
Sun, X.; He, M.; Li, Z. 2020. Novel engineered wood and bamboo composites for structural applications: State-of-art of manufacturing technology and mechanical performance evaluation. Construction and Building Materials 249. e118751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118751 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118751
Thorhallsson, E.R.; Hinriksson, G.I.; Snæbjörnsson, J.T. 2017. Strength and stiffness of glulam beams reinforced with glass and basalt fibres. Composites Part B: Engineering 115: 300-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.074
Treu, A.; Bredesen, R.; Bongers, F. 2020. Enhanced bonding of acetylated wood with an MUF-based adhesive and a resorcinol-formaldehyde-based primer. Holzforschung 74(4): 382-390. https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2019-0056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2019-0056
Zhan, Z.; Wang, C.; Yap, J.B.H.; Loi, M.S. 2020. Retrofitting ancient timber glulam mortise & tenon construction joints through computer-aided laser cutting. Heliyon 6(4). e03671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03671 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03671
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de Reconocimiento de Creative Commons CC-BY que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
