Biomass yield and bioenergy potential of stem and forest by-products in three Eucalyptus species
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22320/s0718221x/2026.22Keywords:
Bioenergy, Forest biomass, forest by-products, energy stock, biomass allocation, EucalyptusAbstract
Forest biomass is widely used as a biofuel for energy generation due to its renewable nature and favorable technological properties. However, information regarding the contribution of different tree components to biomass production and energy stock remains limited, particularly for fast-growing Eucalyptus species used in bioenergy systems. Therefore, this research aimed to evaluate the performance and energy stock of the stem and forest by-products in three Eucalyptus species. The data were collected from Eucalyptus benthamii (camden white gum), Eucalyptus dunnii (white gum), and Eucalyptus saligna (blue gum) trees at six-years-old, cultivated in the south of Brazil. The wood basic density, the wood calorific value and the dry biomass of the tree stems were determined, the dry biomass and the calorific value of the co-products (bark, leaves, and branches) were also determined. Finally, the biomass stock and energy yield of wood and by-products of the species used were determined. The stem contributed 66 % to 81 % in total biomass while the by-products 19 % to 34 %. The energy stock was over 360 GJ ha-1 and 81 GJ ha-1 for the stem and by-products, respectively. The stem showed the highest biomass stock and energy yield; however, forest by-products, particularly bark and branches, also presented substantial energy potential. These findings improve the understanding of biomass allocation and energy stock distribution among Eucalyptus tree components and demonstrate the importance of considering forest by-products as complementary feedstocks for bioenergy systems. Among the species evaluated, Eucalyptus benthamii showed the best overall performance, combining high biomass yield, favorable energy properties, and superior energy stock.
Downloads
References
Alvares, C.A.; Stape, J.L.; Sentelhas, P.C.; Moraes, G.J.L.; Sparovek, G. 2013. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 22(6): 711–728. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507
ASTM International. 2017. Standard Test Methods for Density and Specific Gravity (Relative Density) of Wood and Wood-Based Materials. ASTM D2395-17. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2395-17
ASTM International. 2023. Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Refuse-Derived Fuel by the Bomb Calorimeter. ASTM E711-23e1. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0711-23E01
Bentancor, L.; Hernández, J.; del Pino, A.; Califra, Á.; Resquín, F.; González-Barrios, P. 2019. Evaluation of the biomass production, energy yield and nutrient removal of Eucalyptus dunnii Maiden grown in short rotation coppice under two initial planting densities and harvest systems. Biomass and Bioenergy 122: 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.01.019
Bonfatti Júnior, E.A.; Lengowski, E.C.; Cabral, B.M.; Oliveira, T.W.G.D.; Barros, J.M.R.D.; Oliveira, R.S.; Andrade, A.S.; Klock, U.; Silva, D.A. 2023. Basic wood density, fiber dimensions, and wood chemical composition of four Eucalyptus species planted in southern Brazil. Revista Árvore 47. e4704. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-908820230000004
Bonfatti Júnior, E.A.; Oliveira, R.S.; Lengowski, E.C.; Andrade, A.S.; Silva, D.A. 2025. Correlation between the heating value and the chemical characteristics of Eucalyptus biomass. Ciência Rural 55(4). e20240100
Chen, X.H.; Tee, K.; Elnahass, M.; Ahmed, R. 2023. Assessing the environmental impacts of renewable energy sources: A case study on air pollution and carbon emissions in China. Journal of Environmental Management 345. e118525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118525
Clauser, N.M.; González, G.; Mendieta, C.M.; Kruyeniski, J.; Area, M.C.; Vallejos, M.E. 2021. Biomass Waste as Sustainable Raw Material for Energy and Fuels. Sustainability 13(2). e794. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020794
Cremonez, V.G.; Bonfatti Júnior, E.A.; Andrade, S.A.; Silva, E.L.D.; Klitzke, R.J.; Klock, U. 2019. Wood basic density effect of Eucalyptus grandis in the paper making. Matéria 24(3). e12420. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-707620190003.0735
Cunha, T.Q.G.D.; Santos, A.C.; Novaes, E.; Hansted, A.L.S.; Yamaji, F.M.; Sette Júnior, C.R. 2021. Eucalyptus expansion in Brazil: Energy yield in new forest frontiers. Biomass and Bioenergy 144. e105900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105900
Dick, G.; Schumacher, M.V.; Momolli, D.R.; Santos, J.C.; Ludvichak, A.A.; Guimarães, C.C.; Souza, H.P. 2016. Quantificação da biomassa e nutrientes em um povoamento de Eucalyptus dunnii Maiden estabelecido no Bioma Pampa. Revista Ecologia e Nutrição Florestal 4(1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5902/2316980X20589
Empresa de Pesquisa Energética. 2023. Balanço Energético Nacional: ano base 2022. EPE: Brasília, Brazil.
Flores, R.I.B.; Barreda, C.E.F.; Quinayá, D.C.P.; Zúñiga, U.F.R. 2023. Energy Potential of Agricultural and Forestry By-Products in Peru. Journal of Renewable Energy and Environment 10(1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.30501/jree.2022.323731.1310
Habitzreiter, T.L.; Adami, P.F.; Brun, E.J.; Batista, V.V.; Ferreira, M.L.; Giacomel, C.L. 2009. Poder calorífico e análise econômica do uso total ou parcial da biomassa de eucaliptos. Scientia Agraria Paranaensis 18(3): 282–288. https://doi.org/10.18188/sap.v18i3.21822
Indústria Brasileira de Árvores. 2025. Relatório anual 2025. Ibá: Brasília, Brazil.
International Energy Agency. 2022. Renewables 2022: Analysis and Forecast to 2027. IEA: Paris, France.
International Organization for Standardization. 2022. Solid biofuels — Determination of calorific value. ISO 18125:2017. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland.
James, A.K.; Thring, R.W.; Helle, S.; Ghuman, H.S. 2012. Ash Management Review – Applications of Biomass Bottom Ash. Energies 5(10): 3856–3873. https://doi.org/10.3390/en5103856
Kouki, H.; Amri, I.; Souihi, M.; Pieracci, Y.; Trabelsi, I.; Hamrouni, L.; Flamini, G.; Hirsh, A.M.; Mabrouck, Y. 2023. Chemical composition, antioxidant, herbicidal and antifungal activities of leaf essential oils from three Tunisian Eucalyptus species. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 130: 1411–1422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-023-00772-2
Leitão, V.F.; Gottschalk, L.M.F.; Ferrara, M.A.; Nepomuceno, A.L.; Molinari, H.B.C.; Bom, E.P.S. 2010. Biomass Residues in Brazil: Availability and Potential Uses. Waste and Biomass Valorization 1: 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-010-9008-8
Lengowski, E.C.; Bonfatti Júnior, E.A.; Vatras, B.; Moreira Neto, P.B.; Barros, J.M.R.; Nisgoski, S. 2020. Properties of Wood from Frost-Tolerant Eucalyptus Planted in Brazil. Wood and Fiber Science 52: 431–435. https://doi.org/10.22382/wfs-2020-041
Lisý, M.; Lisá, H.; Jecha, D.; Baláš, M.; Križan, P. 2020. Characteristic Properties of Alternative Biomass Fuels. Energies 13(6). e1448. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13061448
Neiva, D.M.; Araújo, S.; Gominho, J.; Carneiro, A.C.; Pereira, H. 2018. Potential of Eucalyptus globulus industrial bark as a biorefinery feedstock: Chemical and fuel characterization. Industrial Crops and Products 123: 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.06.070
Neiva, D.M.; Gominho, J.; Fernandes, L.; Lourenço, A.; Chemetova, C.; Simões, R.M.S.; Pereira, H. 2016. The Potential of Hydrothermally Pretreated Industrial Barks From Eucalyptus globulus as a Feedstock for Pulp Production. Journal of Wood Chemistry and Technology 36(6): 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773813.2016.1184280
Osman, A.I.; Chen, L.; Yang, M.; Msigwa, G.; Farghali, M.; Fawzy, S.; Rooney, D.W.; Yap, P.S. 2023a. Cost, environmental impact, and resilience of renewable energy under a changing climate: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters 21: 741–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01532-8
Osman, A.I.; Lai, Z.Y.; Farghali, M.; Yiin, C.L.; Elgarahy, A.M.; Hammad, A.; Ihara, I.; Al-Fatesh, A.S.; Rooney, D.W.; Yap, P.S. 2023b. Optimizing biomass pathways to bioenergy and biochar application in electricity generation, biodiesel production, and biohydrogen production. Environmental Chemistry Letters 21: 2639–2705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-023-01613-2
R Core Team. 2023. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org/
Resquin, F.; Navarro-Cerrillo, R.M.; Letelier, L.C.; Casnati, C.R. 2019. Influence of contrasting stocking densities on the dynamics of above-ground biomass and wood density of Eucalyptus benthamii, Eucalyptus dunnii, and Eucalyptus grandis for bioenergy in Uruguay. Forest Ecology and Management 438: 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.02.007
Rocha, M.; Vital, B.; Carneiro, A.; Carvalho, A.; Cardoso, M.; Hein, P. 2016. Effects of Plant Spacing on the Physical, Chemical and Energy Properties of Eucalyptus Wood and Bark. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 28(3): 243-248.
Sahoo, G.; Sharma, A.; Dash, A.C. 2022. Biomass from trees for bioenergy and biofuels – A briefing paper. Materials Today: Proceedings 65(2): 461–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.639
Sette Júnior, C.R.; Da Cunha, T.Q.G.; Coneglian, A.; Hansted, A.L.S.; Da Silva, D.A.; Lima, P.A.F.; Silva, M.F.; Yamaji, F.M. 2020b. Does the Presence of Bark in the Wood of Fast-Growing Forest Species Significantly Change the Energy Potential? BioEnergy Research 13: 222–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-020-10115-w
Sette Júnior, C.R.; Moraes, M.D.A.; Coneglian, A.; Ribeiro, R.M.; Hansted, A.L.S.; Yamaji, F.M. 2020a. Forest harvest byproducts: Use of waste as energy. Wast Management 114:196-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.07.001
Silva, D.A.; Muller, B.V.; Kuiaski, E.C.; Eloy, E.; Behling, A.; Colaço, C.M. 2015. Propriedades da madeira de Eucalyptus benthamii para produção de energia. Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira 35(84): 481–485. https://doi.org/10.4336/2015.pfb.35.84.677
Simetti, R.; Bonduelle, G.M.; Silva, D.A. 2018a. Wood quality of five Eucalyptus species planted in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil for charcoal production. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 30(2): 175–181. https://doi.org/10.26525/jtfs2018.30.2.175181
Simetti, R.; Bonduelle, G.M.; Silva, D.A.; Mayer, S.L.S.; Souza, H.P.; Muniz, G.I.B.D. 2018b. Production of biomass and energy stock for five Eucalyptus species. Revista Ciência da Madeira 9(1): 30–36. https://doi.org/10.12953/2177-6830/rcm.v9n1p30-36
Smil, V. 2018. Energy and Civilization. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. ISBN: 978-0-262-53616-5, 562p.
Soeder, D.J. 2021. Greenhouse gas sources and mitigation strategies from a geosciences perspective. Advances in Geo-Energy Research 5(3): 274–285. https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2021.03.04
Spinelli, R.; Visser, R.; Björheden, R.; Röser, D. 2019. Recovering Energy Biomass in Conventional Forest Operations: A Review of Integrated Harvesting Systems. Current Forestry Reports 5: 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-019-00089-0
Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry (TAPPI). 2021. Sampling and preparing wood for analysis. TAPPI T257 sp-21. TAPPI: Atlanta, GA, USA. https://imisrise.tappi.org/TAPPI/Products/01/T/0104T257.aspx
Telmo, C.; Lousada, J. 2011. The explained variation by lignin and extractive contents on higher heating value of wood. Biomass and Bioenergy 35(5): 1663–1667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.12.038
Velvizhi, G.; Balakumar, K.; Shetti, N.P.; Ahmad, E.; Pant, K.K.; Aminabhavi, T.M. 2022. Integrated biorefinery processes for conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to value added materials: Paving a path towards circular economy. Bioresource Technology 343. e126151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126151
Yang, J.; Yu, Y.; Ma, T.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Q. 2021. Evolution of energy and metal demand driven by industrial revolutions and its trend analysis. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment 19(3): 256–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjpre.2021.12.028
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de Reconocimiento de Creative Commons CC-BY que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.






























