The school as a space for mediation: pedagogical experiences to transform the reading climate
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article addresses the complex challenge of transforming literacy instruction, which has often been reduced to more mechanical assessment practices, thus losing its social value and impact on student identity. In response, the following "Situated Didactic Model for Activating Reading Motivation" is proposed, which envisions a restructuring of the teacher's role: from a traditional transmitter of knowledge to a cultural mediator who creates meaningful experiences. At the micro-curricular level, the model is structured around three central pedagogical actions: the creation of contextualized experiences, the instruction of cognitive strategies, and constructive feedback. These teacher interventions aim to activate the three drivers of student motivation: (1). autonomy, (2) competence, and (3) social relevance, which are integrated and processed through self-efficacy and a positive emotional climate that helps reduce anxiety. Finally, the article reflects on how curricular standardization and monolithic, large-scale classrooms hinder its implementation. It is concluded that applying this framework is important to cultivate commitment and create an authentic, voluntary, and autonomous reading habit.
Article Details
Issue
Section
How to Cite
References
Bandura, A. (1994). Autoeficacia. En VS Ramachaudran (Ed.), Enciclopedia de humanos comportamiento (Vol. 4, págs.71-81). Nueva York: Academic Press. (Reimpreso en H. Friedman [Ed.], Enciclopedia de salud mental. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998)
Chambers, A. (2007). Dime: Los niños, la lectura y la conversación. México D.F., México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Corrigan, J. A., & Slomp, D. H. (2021). Articulating a Sociocognitive Construct of Writing Expertise for the Digital Age. The Journal of Writing Analytics, 5. https://doi.org/10.37514/JWA-J.2021.5.1.05
Didactext, G. (2015). Nuevo marco para la producción de textos académicos. Didáctica. Lengua y Literatura, 27, 219-254. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/DIDA/article/view/DIDA1515110219A
Graham, S. (2006). Instrucción estratégica y enseñanza de la escritura: un metaanálisis. En C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham y J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Manual de investigación sobre escritura. Nueva York: The Guilford Press. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2017.72010
Hayes, J. (1996): «A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing, en C.M. LEVY y S. RANSDELL (eds.). The science of writing: theories, methods, individual differences, and applications, New Yersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hyland, K. (2003). Second Language Writing. Cambridge University Press.
Ramírez Bravo, R., & Álvarez Angulo, T. (2006). Teorías o modelos de producción de textos en la enseñanza y el aprendizaje de la escritura. Didáctica. Lengua y Literatura, 18, 29-60. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2201293
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68