Sustentabilidade no mercado virtual brasileiro de casas de madeira
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22320/07190700.2023.13.01.02Palavras-chave:
setor da construção, estruturas de madeira, estudos de mercado, sustentabilidadeResumo
As casas de madeira são uma alternativa sustentável e baseada em biorrecursos à construção tradicional com alvenaria e aço. Estudos recentes mostram que esse setor no Brasil é representado por centenas de PMEs focadas em casas de madeira. Este estudo exploratório analisou essa população por meio de uma avaliação dos perfis disponíveis na rede social Instagram®, observando suas estratégias de negócios e o que divulgavam aos clientes sobre benefícios e questões relativas à sustentabilidade. Todos os perfis corporativos disponíveis foram pesquisados e uma amostra significativa de cerca de 80% do setor foi compilada, em um mercado atualmente formado por mais de 400 empresas. No entanto, cerca de 70% dessas empresas brasileiras ainda não exploram adequadamente as questões da sustentabilidade em seus produtos e serviços de habitação de madeira, evidenciando um cenário incipiente. Além disso, existe uma clara oportunidade para aproveitar os argumentos publicados em seus perfis do Instagram® como uma estratégia afirmativa de conscientização. Embora algumas justificativas tenham sido sugeridas para convencer os clientes domésticos a considerarem a habitação de madeira, ainda resta muito espaço para melhorias nesse mercado virtual.
Downloads
Referências
AHMED, S. (2021). Evaluating the feasibility of mass timber as a mainstream building material in the US construction market: industry perception, cost competitiveness, and environmental performance analysis. [Doctoral thesis in Civil Engineering, Oregon State University]. Corvallis: OSU, 1-187.
BARTIK, A., BERTRAND, M., CULLEN, Z., GLAESER, E. L., LUCA, M. & STANTON, M. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on small business outcomes and expectations. PNAS, 117(30), 17656-17666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.200699111
BAUER, B., KOPPELHUBER, J., WALL, J. & HECK, D. (2017). Impact factors on the cost calculation for building services within the built environment. Procedia Engineering, 171, 294-301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.337
BURNARD, M., NYRUD, A., BYSHEIM, K., KUTNAR, A., VAHTIKARI, K. & HUGHES, M. (2017). Building material naturalness: perceptions from Finland, Norway and Slovenia. Indoor and Built Environment, 26(1), 92-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X15605162
CHANDRAGIRI, A., JEELANI, S., AKTHAR, S. & LINGESHWARAN, N. (2021). A study and identification of the time and cost overrun in the construction project. Materials Today: Proceedings, 47(15), 5426-5431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.268
CHEN, J., VULLIKANTI, A., SANTOS, J., VENKATRAMANAN, S., HOOPS, S., MORTVEIT, H., LEWIS, B., YOU, W., EUBANK, S., MARATHE, M., BARRETT, C. & MARATHE, A. (2021). Epidemiological and economic impact of COVID-19 in the US. Scientific Reports, 11, 20451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99712-z
DE ARAUJO, V., GUTIÉRREZ-AGUILAR, C., CORTEZ-BARBOSA, J., GAVA, M. & GARCIA, J. (2019). Disponibilidad de las técnicas constructivas de habitación en madera, en Brasil. Revista de Arquitectura, 21(1), 68-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14718/RevArq.2019.21.1.2014
DE ARAUJO, V., ŠVAJLENKA, J., VASCONCELOS, J., SANTOS, H., SERRA, S., ALMEIDA FILHO, F., PALIARI, J., LAHR, F. & CHRISTOFORO, A. (2022a). Is the timber construction sector prepared for e-commerce via Instagram®? A perspective from Brazil. Sustainability, 14(14), 8683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148683
DE ARAUJO, V., VASCONCELOS, J., GAVA, M., CHRISTOFORO, A., LAHR, F. & GARCIA, J. (2021a). What does Brazil know about the origin and uses of tree species employed in the housing sector? Perspectives on available species, origin and current challenges. International Forestry Review, 23(3), 392-404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1505/146554821833992794
DE ARAUJO, V., VASCONCELOS, J., LAHR, F. & CHRISTOFORO, A. (2022b). Timber forest products: a way to intensify global bioeconomy from bio-materials. Acta Facultatis Xylologiae Zvolen, 64(1), 99-111. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17423/afx.2022.64.1.09
DE ARAUJO, V., VASCONCELOS, J., BIAZZON, J., MORALES, E., CORTEZ, J., GAVA, M. & GARCIA, J. (2020a). Production and market of timber housing in Brazil. Pro Ligno, 16(1), 17-27. Retrieved from: https://www.proligno.ro/en/articles/2020/1/DE%20ARAUJO.pdf
DE ARAUJO, V., VASCONCELOS, J., CORTEZ-BARBOSA, J., MORALES, E., CHRISTOFORO, A., GAVA, M., LAHR, F. & GARCIA, J. (2020b). Wood consumption and fixations of carbon dioxide and carbon from timber housing techniques: A Brazilian panorama. Energy and Buildings, 216, 109960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109960
DE ARAUJO, V., VASCONCELOS, J., CORTEZ-BARBOSA, J., MORALES, E., GAVA, M., SAVI, A. & GARCIA, J. (2016). Wooden residential buildings – a sustainable approach. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov - Series II, 9(58), 53-62. Retrieved from: https://webbut.unitbv.ro/index.php/Series_II/article/view/816/748
DE ARAUJO, V., VASCONCELOS, J., MORALES, E., LAHR, F. & CHRISTOFORO, A. (2021b). Characterization of business poles of timber houses in Brazil. Mercator, 20(2), 1-15. Retrieved from: http://www.mercator.ufc.br/mercator/article/view/e20026
DOMLJAN, D. & JANKOVIC, L. (2022). Design of sustainable modular wooden booths inspired by revitalization of Croatian traditional construction and new user needs due to COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(2), 720-742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020720
Egan Consulting. (2017). Annual survey of UK structural timber markets: market report 2016. Alloa: Structural Timber Association.
EGGER, D., MIGUEL, E., WARREN, S., SHENOY, A., COLLINS, E., KARLAN, D., PARKERSON, D., MOBARAK, A., FINK, G., UDRY, C., WALKER, M., HAUSHOFER, J., LARREBOURE, M., ATHEY, S., LOPEZ-PENA, P., BENHACHMI, S., HUMPHREYS, M., LOWE, L., MERIGGI, N., WABWIRE, A., DAVIS, C., PAPE, U., GRAFF, T., VOORS, M., NEKESA, C. & VERNOT, C. (2021). Falling living standards during the COVID-19 crisis: quantitative evidence from nine developing countries. Science Advances, 7(6), 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe0997
FUJII, H. & MANAGI, S. (2013). Which industry is greener? An empirical study of nine industries in OECD countries. Energy Policy, 57, 381-388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.011
GARAY, R., PFENNIGER, F., CASTILLO, M. & FRITZ, C. (2021). Quality and sustainability indicators of the prefabricated wood housing industry - a Chilean case study. Sustainability, 13(15), 8523. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158523
GARAY-MOENA, R., CASTILLO-SOTO, M., FRITZ-FUENTES, C. & ORTEGA, C. (2022). Desarrollo de un indicador integrado de sustentabilidad y seguridad estructural para el mercado de viviendas de madera aplicado a Chile central. Hábitat Sustentable, 12(1), 8-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22320/07190700.2022.12.01.01
GUSTAVSSON, L. & SATHRE, R. (2006). Variability in energy and carbon dioxide balances of wood and concrete building materials. Building and Environment, 41, 940-951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.04.008
HAMMOND, G. & JONES, C. (2008). Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 161(2), 87-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/ener.2008.161.2.87
HARRIS, R. & SOCRATOUS, M. (2013). Preface. Schober, K. (Ed.). Innovative timber composites - improving wood with other materials. COST Action FP1004. Bath: University of Bath.
HART, J. & POMPONI, F. (2020). More timber in construction: unanswered questions and future challenges. Sustainability, 12(8), 3473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083473
HEILMAYR, R., ECHEVERRÍA, C. & LAMBIN, E. (2020). Impacts of Chilean forest subsidies on forest cover, carbon and biodiversity. Nature Sustainability, 3, 701-709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0547-0
HERÄJÄRVI, H. (2019). Wooden buildings as carbon storages – Mitigation or oration? Wood Material Science & Engineering, 14(5), 291-297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2019.1635205
HIGHLEY, T. L. & SCHEFFER, T. (1989). Controlling decay in waterfront structures: evaluation, prevention, and remedial treatments. FPL-RP-494. Madison: FPL.
HØIBØ, O., HANSEN, E. & NYBAKK, E. (2015). Building material preferences with a focus on wood in urban housing: durability and environmental impacts. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 45(11), 1617-1627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2015-0123
HURMEKOSKI, E., JONSSON, R. & NORD, T. (2015). Context, drivers, and future potential for wood-frame multi-story construction in Europe. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 99, 181-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.002
IBÁ (2020). Relatório anual 2020. São Paulo: IBÁ.
IQBAL, M., AHMAD, N., WAQAS, M., ABRAR, M. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic and construction industry: Impacts, emerging construction safety practices, and proposed crisis management. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 18(2), 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2021.034
IVANOV, A. (2005). Revitalization of historic wooden housing using local entrepreneurs’
capacity (cases of towns of Gorodets, Russia and Eksjö, Sweden). [Master’s dissertation in Urban Management and Development, Lund University]. Lund: Lund University, 1-89.
KOPPELHUBER, J., BAUER, B., WALL, J. & HECK, D. (2017). Industrialized timber building systems for an increased market share – a holistic approach targeting construction management and building economics. Procedia Engineering, 171, 333-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.341
LARSEN, J., SHEN, G., LINDHARD, S. & BRUNOE, T. (2016). Factors affecting schedule delay, cost overrun, and quality level in public construction projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 32, 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000391
Leite-Filho, A., Soares-Filho, B., Davis, J., Abrahão, G. & Börner, J. (2021). Deforestation reduces rainfall and agricultural revenues in the Brazilian Amazon. Nature Communications, 12, 2591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22840-7
LIMA, M. (2017). Brasileiros são os que mais procuram por produtos com certificado florestal. Retrieved from: <https://www.correiobraziliense.com.br/app/noticia/economia/2017/11/03/internas_economia,638392/brasileiros-sao-os-que-mais-procuram-produtos-certificado-florestal.shtml>.
MALDONADO, M., ESQUIVEL, A. & CHAN, A. (2020). Calidad en el servicio en micronegocios del sector artesanal de madera en una comisaría de Mérida, México. Ingeniare, 28, 120-132. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33052020000100120
MBIE. (2021). Building and construction sector trends annual report 2021. Wellington: MBIE, 1-39.
MEIJUEIRO, D., LOPES, C., ALVES, R., SILVEIRA, B., GRACIOLI, C. & ROSSO, S. (2020). Certificação em manejo florestal e em cadeia de custódia no Brasil. Brazilian Journal of Development, 6(8), 57324-57340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n8-223
MOORE, N. (2015). Timber utilisation statistics 2015. Alicante: Timbertrends.
MORGADO, L. & PEDRO, J. (2011). Caracterização da oferta de casas de madeira em Portugal: inquérito às empresas de projecto, fabrico, construção e comercialização. Relatório 118/2011 – NAU. Lisboa: LNEC., 1-173.
OLIVER, C., NASSAR, N., LIPPKE, B. & MCCARTER, J. (2014). Carbon, fossil fuel, and biodiversity mitigation with wood and forests. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 33, 248-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2013.839386
PEARSON, T., SWAILS, E. & BROWN, S. (2012). Wood product accounting and climate change mitigation projects involving tropical timber: Winrock international report to the international tropical timber organization. Report. Little Rock: Winrock International.
PINHEIRO, R., CASTRO, G., SILVA, H. & NUNES, J. (2011). Pesquisa de mercado. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV.
POMPONI, F., HART, J., AREHART, J. & D’AMICO, B. (2020). Buildings as a global carbon sink? A reality check on feasibility limits. One Earth, 3(2), 157-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.07.018
RABELO, L., MAESTRI, M., AQUINO, M., BAUMANN, S. & BRÍGIDA, C. (2020). Cenário das árvores plantadas no Brasil. Biodiversidade, 19(3), 170-179. Retrieved from: https://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/biodiversidade/article/view/10825
RAMAGE, M., BURRIDGE, H., BUSSE-WICHER, M., FEREDAY, G., REYNOLDS, T., SHAH, D., WU, G., YU, L., FLEMING, P., DENSLEY-TINGLEY, D., ALLWOOD, J., DUPREE, P., LINDEN, P. & SCHERMAN, O. (2017). The wood from the trees: the use of timber in construction. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68(1), 333-359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.107
Raosoft (2004). Raosoft Sample Size Calculator. Seattle: Raosoft. Retrieved from: http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html.
RATTNER, H. (1999). Sustentabilidade - uma visão humanista. Ambiente & Sociedade, 5, 233-240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-753X1999000200020
RIBEIRO, M. (2020). A Brazilian forest community shows certified timber really does work. Retrieved from: https://news.mongabay.com/2020/07/a-brazilian-forest-community-shows-certified-timber-really-does-work/.
ROMERO, C., GUARIGUATA, M., PUTZ, F., SILLS, E., LIMA, G., PAPP, L., VOIGTLAENDER, M. & VIDAL, E. (2015). The context of natural forest management and FSC certification in Brazil. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
SENOUCI, A., ISMAIL, A. & ELDIN, N. (2016). Time delay and cost overrun in Qatari public construction projects. Procedia Engineering, 164, 368-375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.632
SHIGUE, E. (2018). Difusão da construção em madeira no Brasil: agentes, ações e produtos. [Doctoral thesis in Architecture, University of São Paulo]. São Carlos: USP, 1-237.
SINGH, R. (2010). Delays and cost overruns in infrastructure projects: extent, causes and remedies. Economic & Political Weekly, 45(21), 43-54. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27807050
SVAJLENKA, J. & KOZLOVSKÁ, M. (2020a). Analysis of the energy balance of constructions based on wood during their use in connection with CO2 emissions. Energies, 13(18), 4843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184843
SVAJLENKA, J. & KOZLOVSKÁ, M. (2020b). Evaluation of the efficiency and sustainability of timber-based construction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259, 120835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120835
SVAJLENKA, J. & KOZLOVSKÁ, M. (2018). Houses based on wood as an ecological and sustainable housing alternative - case study. Sustainability, 10(5), 1502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051502
VERSCHUUR, J., KOKS, E. & HALL, J. (2021). Global economic impacts of COVID-19 lockdown measures stand out in high-frequency shipping data. PLoS ONE, 16, 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248818
VIHOLAINEN, N., KYLKILAHTI, E., AUTIO, M., PÖYHÖNEN, J. & TOPPINEN, A. (2021). Bringing ecosystem thinking to sustainability-driven wooden construction business. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292, 126029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126029
WAHL, A. (Ed.). (2008). Wood market trends in Europe. SP-49. Trend 3. Vancouver: FPInnovations, 40.
WANG, L., TOPPINEN, A. & JUSLIN, H. (2014). Use of wood in green building: a study of expert perspectives from the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 350-361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.023
WARGULA, L., KUKLA, M., WIECZOREK, B. & KRAWIEC, P. (2022). Energy consumption of the wood size reduction processes with employment of a low-power machines with various cutting mechanisms. Renewable Energy, 181, 630-639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.09.039
WHERRY, G. & BUEHLMANN, U. (2014) Product life cycle of the manufactured home industry. BioResources, 9, 6652-6668. Retrieved from: https://bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/BioRes_09_4_6652_Wherry_Buehlmann_Product_Life_Cycle_Home_Industry_5443.pdf
YAZDI, M., ZAKARIA, R., MUSTAFFA, M., MAJID, M., ZIN, R., ISMAIL, M. & YAHYA, K. (2014). Desalination and Water Treatment, 52(19-21), 3631-3636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.854105
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Victor Almeida-De Araujo, Juliano Souza-Vasconcelos, Sheyla Mara Baptista-Serra, André Luis Christoforo, José Carlos Paliari
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-CompartilhaIgual 4.0.
O conteúdo dos artigos publicados em cada número do Habitat Sustentável é da exclusiva responsabilidade dos autores e não representa necessariamente o pensamento ou compromete a opinião da Universidad del Bío-Bío.
Os autores mantêm os seus direitos de autor e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação da sua obra, que está simultaneamente sujeita à Licença de Atribuição Creative Commons CC BY-SA que permite a outros partilhar, transformar ou criar novo material a partir desta obra para fins não comerciais, desde que a autoria e a primeira publicação nesta revista sejam reconhecidas, e as suas novas criações sejam licenciadas sob os mesmos termos.