Exploratory studies on effects of growth location and conditioning on treatability and permeability of southern pine lumber

Authors

  • Jerrold E. Winandy
  • H. M. Barnes
  • Jeffrey J. Morrell

Keywords:

Drying, growing range, lumber, permeability, southern pine, treatability

Abstract

Southern pine lumber is often treated with preservatives, but issues related to initial kiln-drying conditions and geographic source across the wide southern pine growth range have been suspected to negatively affect subsequent permeability and treatability. These effects remain poorly understood. In this series of exploratory studies, southern pine from across part of the growing range subjected to different kiln-drying regimes was evaluated in three phases exploring the effects of geographic source and initial kiln-drying conditions on permeability, pit structure and eventual preservative treatment of southern pine lumber. The results suggest that elevated temperatures coupled with poor humidity control at the start of the kiln drying process may negatively influence permeability and preservative penetration, but had only negligible effects on several other wood properties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adhikari, A.; Masters, R.E.; Adams, H.; Mainali, K.P.; Zou, C.B.; Joshi, O.; Will, R.E. 2021. Effects of climate variability and management on shortleaf pine radial growth across a forest-savanna continuum in a 34-year experiment. For Ecol Manag 491: 119125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119125

American Society for Testing and Materials International. 2003. D2395-02: Standard test method for specific gravity of wood and wood-based materials. ASTM Annual Book of Standards. West Conshohocken, PA, USA. https://www.astm.org/DATABASE.CART/HISTORICAL/D2395-02.htm

American Wood Protection Association. 2001a. AWPA T-1-19: Use Category System: Processing and Treatment Standard. Annual Book of Standards. AWPA. Birmingham. USA. https://awpa.com/standards/ucs

American Wood Protection Association. 2001b. AWPA A2-98: Method 2. Method for determining the penetration of copper containing preservatives. Annual Book of Standards. AWPA. Birmingham. USA. https://www.techstreet.com/standards/awpa-a2-98?product_id=154

American Wood Protection Association. 2001c. AWPA M2-01: Standard for inspection of wood products treated with preservatives. Annual Book of Standards. AWPA. Birmingham, USA. https://www.techstreet.com/standards/awpa-m2-01?product_id=925676

Bendtsen, B.A.; Ethington, R.L. 1972. Properties of major Southern pines: Part II Structural properties and specific gravity. USDA Forest Service FPL-RP-177. Madison, WI, USA. 76p. https://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplrp/fplrp176_177.pdf

Booker, R.E. 1990. Changes in transverse wood permeability during the drying of Dacrydium cypressinum and Pinus radiata. N Z J For Sci 20(2): 231-244. https://www.scionresearch.com/data/assets/pdf_file/0005/59936/NZJFS202231BOOKER.pdf

Booker, R.E.; Evans. J.M. 1994. The effect of drying schedule on the radial permeability of Pinus radiata D. Don. Holz Roh Werkst 52: 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02615211

Cai, L.; Oliveira, L.C. 2007. Gas permeability of wetwood and normal wood of Subalpine fir in relation to drying. Dry Technol 25(3): 501-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930601184072

Comstock, G.L. 1967. Longitudinal permeability of wood to gases and non-swelling liquids. Forest Prod J 17(10): 41-46. https://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/pdf1968/comst68a.pdf

Comstock. G.L.; Côté Jr., W.A. 1968. Factors affecting permeability and pit aspiration in coniferous sapwood. Wood Sci Technol 2: 279-291. https://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/pdf1968/comst68a.pdf

Davis, M.W. 1998. A rapid modified method for compositional carbohydrate analysis of lignocellulosics by high pH anion-exchange chromatography. JWCT 18(2): 235-252. https://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/pdf1998/davis98a.pdf

Dahlen, J.; Auty, D.; Eberhardt, T.L. 2018. Models for predicting specific gravity and ring width for loblolly pine from intensively managed plantation and implications for wood utilization. Forests 9: 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9060292

Eberhardt, T.L.; Dahlen, J.; Schimleck L. 2017. Species comparison of the physical properties of loblolly and slash pine wood and bark. Can J For Res 47: 1495-1505. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2017-0091

Erickson, H.D.; Schmitz, H.; Gortner, R.A. 1937. The permeability of woods to liquids and factors affecting rate of flow. Tech Bull 122. University of Minnesota Ag. Ext. Sta. St. Paul. MN., USA.

FPL. 2010. Wood Handbook: Wood as an engineering material. USDA, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, FPL-GTR-190. Madison, WI. 508p. https://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplgtr/fpl_gtr190.pdf

Gräns, D; Isik, F.; Purnell, R.C.; Peszlen, I.M.; McKeand, S.E. 2021. Genetic variation and the effect of herbicide and fertilization treatments on wood quality traits in loblolly pine. For Sci 67(5): 564-573. https://doi.org/10.1093/forsci/fxab026

Hunt, G.M.; Garratt, G.A. 1967. Wood Preservation 3rd edition. McGraw-Hill. NY. NY. 433p.

Jewell, R.; Mitchell, P.; Kutscha N. 1990. Species effects on the penetration of CCA in Southern pine lumber. In Proceedings, 85th meeting of the American Wood Preservers’ Association 85: 22-30. American Wood Protection Association, Birmingham, AL., USA.

Keefe, D. 2000-2001. Personal Communications on “Quality control of treated lumber: A common sense approach”. Vice-president and Chief Treated Lumber Inspector. American Wood Preservers’ Bureau. Stone Mountain. GA., USA.

Koch, P. 1972. Utilization of the Southern Pines; Vol. 1. The raw material. USDA Ag Handbook 420. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. Washington, DC., USA. 665p. https://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/ah/ah420_vol1.pdf

Langrish, T.; Walker, J. 2006. Chapter 8: Drying of Timber. In Primary Wood Processing: Principles and Practices. 2nd Ed. Editor: Walker J.C.F. Springer. NY. 583p. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/1-4020-4393-7_8.pdf

Larson, P.R.; Kretschmann, D.E.; Clark, A. III; Isebrands, J.G. 2001. Formation and properties of juvenile wood in southern pines: a synopsis. Gen Tech Rep FPL-GTR-129. Madison. WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture. Forest Service. Forest Products Laboratory. 42 p. https://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr129.pdf

Lebow, S.T.; Morrell, J.J.; Milota, M.R. 1996. Effect of moisture content on treatment of western wood species with chromated copper arsenate. Forest Prod J 46(2): 67-70.

Leggate, W.; Kumar, C.; McGavin R.L.; Faircloth, A.; Knackstedt, M. 2021. The effects of drying method on the wood permeability, wettability, treatability, and gluability of Southern pine from Australia. Bioresources 16(1): 698-720. http://doi.org/10.15376/biores.16.1.698-720

McKeand. S.; Mullin. T.; Byram. T.; White. T. 2003. Deployment of genetically improved loblolly and slash pines in the South. J Forestry 101(3): 32-37. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/101.3.32

Miller, D.; Graham, R. 1963. Treatability of Douglas-fir from Western United States. In Proceedings, 59th meeting of the American Wood Preservers’ Association 59: 218-222. American Wood Protection Association, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Milota, M.; Tschernitz, J.; Verrill, S.; Mianowski, T. 1995. Gas permeability of plantation loblolly pine. Wood Fiber Sci 27(1): 34-40. https://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/pdf1995/milot95a.pdf

Morrell, J.J. 2021. Personal communication on technology extension with Queensland industry and resultant findings. National Centre for Timber Durability and Design Life University of Sunshine Coast, Dutton Park, Queensland, Australia.

Sakagami, H.; Tokunaga, A.; Fujimoto, N.; Koga, S.; Kobayashi, I.; Momohara, I. 2016. Effects of drying temperature for Cryptomeria japonica on the permeability of wood preservative. II: The permeability of dried. split log pieces. Bioresources 11(3): 6896-6908. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.3.6896-6908

Sano, Y.; Nakada, R. 1998. Time course of the secondary deposition of incrusting materials on bordered pit membranes in Cryptomeria japonica. IAWA J 19: 285-299. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90001533

Scheffer, T.C.; Lindgren, R.M. 1940. Stains of sapwood products and their control. Technical Bulletin 714. USDA. Forest Service. Washington. D.C., USA.

Schimleck, L.; Finto, A.; Dahlen, J.; Moore, J. 2018. Wood and fiber quality of plantation-grown conifers: A summary of research with an emphasis on loblolly and radiata pine. Forests 9: 298. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f9060298

Schultz, R.P. 1997. Loblolly pine: Ecology and culture of Loblolly pine. Ag Handbook No. 713. USDA. Forest Service. Washington D.C., USA. https://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/misc/ag_713.pdf

Shiver, B.D.; Rheney, J.W.; Hitch, K.L. 2000. Loblolly pine outperforms Slash pine in Southeastern Georgia and Northern Florida. South J Appl For 24(1): 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/24.1.31

Simpson, W.T. 1991. Dry kiln operator’s manual. USDA Agricultural Handbook No. 188. USDA, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI, USA. 274p. https://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/usda/ah188/ah188.htm

SPIB. 2014. Standard grading rules for southern pine lumber. Southern Pine Inspection Bureau, Pensacola. FL. USA. https://www.spib.org/wood-services/lumber-grading-rules

USGS, 1970. National Atlas of United States of America. U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Dept. of Interior. Washington DC. USA. https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2001/0086/report.pdf

Winandy, J.E.; Green, F. III.; Keefe, D. 2001. Treatability problems – Relationships between anatomy. chemical composition and treatability. In Proceedings of International Research Group on Wood Preservation Document No. IRG/WP 01-40213. Stockholm. Sweden. https://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/pdf2001/winan01b.pdf

Downloads

Published

2022-05-30

How to Cite

Winandy, J. E. ., Barnes, H. M. ., & Morrell, J. J. . (2022). Exploratory studies on effects of growth location and conditioning on treatability and permeability of southern pine lumber. Maderas-Cienc Tecnol, 24. Retrieved from http://revistas.ubiobio.cl/index.php/MCT/article/view/5482

Issue

Section

Article