Ephemeral architecture as an instrument of urban transformation: a systemic analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22320/07196466.2025.43.068.01

Keywords:

ephemeral architecture, public space, urban interventions, urban requalification, systems

Abstract

Based on the findings of a Master's research project, this article examines the role of ephemeral architecture in contemporary urban transformations, exploring how its specific characteristics—temporality, flexibility, and ease of disassembly—can contribute to changes in public space. The primary objective is to analyze the potential of ephemeral architecture as a tool for renovating urban space from a systemic and complex perspective. Through a qualitative methodology based on literature review and document analysis, we examine a substantial set of projects and theoretical contributions, from the seminal works of Cedric Price and Archigram to contemporary interventions in Latin America. The research reveals that ephemerality, traditionally perceived as a limitation, can instead be a strategic asset, allowing for greater experimentation and requiring fewer commitments to the typical restrictions of permanent constructions. The discussion indicates that temporary interventions have significant potential to activate underutilized spaces, catalyze urban requalification processes, and promote new forms of use and appropriation of public space. We conclude that ephemeral architecture, when linked to a systemic approach, can be a relevant design tool for urban contexts that require swift and adaptable interventions, particularly in situations where permanent solutions would be unfeasible or inadequate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Caio Nunes, University of São Paulo (IAU-USP), São Carlos, Brazil

Master's Degree in Architecture and Urbanism. Architect, Institute of Architecture and Urbanism

Marcelo Tramontano, University of São Paulo (IAU-USP), São Carlos, Brazil

PhD in Architecture and Urbanism. Associate Professor at the Institute of Architecture and Urbanism.

References

AGA Estudio. (2016). Multideportivo La Canchita. AGA Estudio. https://www.aga-estudio.com/1100-la-canchita

ALMEIDA, C. (2006). Estudos de caso: Fun Palace [1960-1961]. Nomads. http://www.nomads.usp.br/pesquisas/cultura_digital/complexidade/CASOS/FUN%20PALACE/FUN%20PALACE.htm

BALDWIN, J. (1997). BuckyWorks: Buckminster Fuller’s Ideas for Today (1st ed). Wiley.

BALEM, T., e REYES, P. (2021). Cidade Efêmera, Práticas Urbanas Insurgentes. Temporary City, Insurgent Urban Practices Ciudad Efímera, Prácticas Urbanas Insurgentes. Eixo Temático: Projeto, Políticas E Práticas. ENANPARQ, VI Encontro da Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo. https://enanparq2020.s3.amazonaws.com/MT/21790.pdf

BARRAGÁN, A. O. (2023). La densidad temporal del espacio social. Una aproximación a la arquitectura efímera desde la filosofía de la cultura em M. T. Delfín (Org.), Arquitectura efímera. Reflexiones sobre la mutabilidad del espacio construido (pp. 16–31). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. https://repositorio.fa.unam.mx/handle/123456789/19089

BENUCCI, T. M. (2020). O jeito yanomami de pendurar redes [Tese de mestrado, Universidade de São Paulo]. Biblioteca Digital USR. https://doi.org/10.11606/D.8.2020.tde-09032021-171034

BERGDOLL, B. (2010). The Pavilion and the Expanded Possibilities of Architecture em B. Bergdoll, J. Bettum, P. Schmal, & B. van Berkel (Orgs.), The Pavilion: Pleasure & Polemics in Architecture (Bilingual). Hatje Cantz.

BLÁZQUEZ, F. (2023). Los colectivos de arquitectura latinoamericanos en el siglo XXI. Revisiones en el quehacer profesional. Dearq, (37), 24-31. https://doi.org/10.18389/dearq37.2023.03

BOLAÑOS LINARES, R. B. (2023). Prototipos efímeros del ámbito universitario en el espacio público em M. Trápaga Delfín (Cood.), Arquitectura efímera: Reflexiones sobre la mutabilidad del espacio construido (p. 180–192). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Facultad de Arquitectura. Repositorio de la Facultad de Arquitectura. https://repositorio.fa.unam.mx/handle/123456789/19089

Buckminster Fuller Institute. (2022). Dymaxion House. Buckminster Fuller Institute. https://www.bfi.org/about-fuller/big-ideas/dymaxion-house/

Cedric Price fonds. (1964). Fun Palace: Interior perspective [Fotografias]. Collection Centre Canadien d’Architecture. https://www.cca.qc.ca/en/search/details/collection/object/17580

COOK, P. (Ed.) (1999). Archigram (1st ed). Princeton Architectural Press.

DUNN, N. (2012). Digital Fabrication in Architecture. Laurence King Publishing.

FONTES, A. S. (2011). Intervenções temporárias, marcas permanentes: A amabilidade nos espaços coletivos de nossas cidades [Tese Doutorado, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro]. http://objdig.ufrj.br/21/teses/760108.pdf

HERDT, T. (2021). From Cybernetics to an Architecture of Ecology: Cedric Price’s Inter-Action Centre. FOOTPRINT, 15(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.7480/footprint.15.1.4946

HOBSON, B. (2020, maio 13). Archigram’s Instant City concept enables “a village to become a kind of city for a week” says Peter Cook. Dezeen. https://www.dezeen.com/2020/05/13/archigram-instant-city-peter-cook-video-interview-vdf/amp/

ISOZAKI, A. (2003). Erasing Architecture Into the System em C. Price, Re:CP by Cedric Price. Birkhäuser Architecture

JODIDIO, P. (2011). Temporary Architecture Now!: Temporäre Architektur heute! L’Architecture Éphémère d’aujourd’hui! (1st ed). Taschen America Llc.

KRONENBURG, R. (2000). Portable Architecture. (2nd ed). Elsevier/Architectural Press.

LAVALOU, A. (Ed.). (2005). Conversas com Jean Prouvé (1a ed). Editora Gustavo Gili.

LOBNER, P. (2020). Beech Aircraft Corporation and R. Buckminster Fuller’s Dymaxion house. The Lyncean Group of San Diego. https://lynceans.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Beech-Aircraft-Buckminster-Fuller-Dymaxion-house-converted.pdf

LOBNER, P. (2025). Jean Prouvé and the Demountable House. The Lyncean Group of San Diego. https://lynceans.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Jean-Prouv%C3%A9-demountable-houses-converted.pdf

MATHEWS, S. (2006). The Fun Palace as Virtual Architecture: Cedric Price and the Practices of Indeterminacy. Journal of Architectural Education, 59(3), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1531-314X.2006.00032.x

MEHROTRA, R., e VERA, F. (2017). Ephemeral urbanism: Looking at extreme temporalities em T. Haas e H. Westlund (Eds.), In The Post-Urban World: Emergent Transformation of Cities and Regions in the Innovative Global Economy (1º ed., pp. 44–55). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315672168

MOLINA ESCOBAR, V. (1999). ¿Pensar lo efímero? em S. Roqueta Matías & J. M. Fort Mir (Eds.), Arquitectura, art i espai efímer (1º ed., pp. 15–21). Edicions UPC

MORIN, E. (2008). O método 1: A natureza da natureza (2º ed.). Sulina.

MORIN, E. (2011). Introdução ao pensamento complexo (4o ed.). Sulina.

NOGUERA, B. B. (2023). Revitalización del espacio público a través de instalaciones efímeras como activadores sociales y agentes de cambio em M. Trápaga Delfín (Cood.), Arquitectura efímera: Reflexiones sobre la mutabilidad del espacio construido (p. 201–211). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Arquitectura.

PAZ, D. (2008). Arquitetura efêmera ou transitória. Esboços de uma caracterização. Arquitextos, (102.06). https://vitruvius.com.br/revistas/read/arquitextos/09.102/97

PAZ, D. (18-21 de setembro de 2012). O Lugar evanescente: Características da arquitetura efêmera no sítio. II Encontro Nacional da Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo. Teorias e práticas na arquitetura e na cidade contemporâneas: complexidade, mobilidade, memória e sustentabilidade, Natal. https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/32967

PICO Colectivo. (2017). Proyecto de interés comunal Infraestructuras de empoderamiento social: Contextos emergentes en Venezuela. https://www.academia.edu/45659274/Vol_1_Infraestructuras_de_Empoderamiento_Social_Contextos_emergentes_en_Venezuela

PICO Estudio. (2014). Espacios de Paz – Venezuela. Divisare. https://divisare.com/projects/274169-pico-estudio-espacios-de-paz-venezuela

PRICE, C. (1981). The built environment—The case against conservation. Environmentalist, 1(1), 39–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02239375

PRICE, C. (2003). Re:CP by Cedric Price. Birkhauser.

PROUVÉ, J. (2024a). 6x9 Demountable house, 1944. Architecture. SCE Jean Prouvé & Société Bergerot. https://www.jeanprouve.com/en/fiche/1944-8

PROUVÉ, J. (2024b). “Standart” house, Meudon, 1951. Architecture. SCE Jean Prouvé & Société Bergerot. https://www.jeanprouve.com/en/fiche/1951-34

PUENTE, M. (2000). Exhibition Pavilions: 100 Years. Editorial Gustavo Gili, S.L.

SADLER, S. (2005). Archigram: Architecture Without Architecture. The MIT Press.

SILVA, M. S. K. DA. (2004). Redescobrindo a arquitetura do Archigram. Arquitextos, (048.05). https://vitruvius.com.br/revistas/read/arquitextos/04.048/585

Survival Brasil. (17 de novembro de 2016). Novas fotos incríveis de um povo isolado na Amazônia – que pode ser exterminada. Survival. https://survivalbrasil.org/ultimas-noticias/11504

VIEIRA, C. L. F. (2021). Espacios de Paz: Uma experiência na Venezuela [Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Federal da Paraíba]. Repositório Institucional da UFPB. https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/21315

VON BERTALANFFY, L. (1975). Teoria Geral dos Sistemas (2a ed). Vozes.

WILKEN, R. (2007). Calculated Uncertainty: Computers, Chance Encounters, and “Community” in the Work of Cedric Price. TRANSFORMATIONS Journal of Media & Culture, (14). http://www.transformationsjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Wilken_Transformations14.pdf

Published

2025-10-01

How to Cite

Nunes, C., & Tramontano, M. (2025). Ephemeral architecture as an instrument of urban transformation: a systemic analysis. ARQUITECTURAS DEL SUR, 43(68), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.22320/07196466.2025.43.068.01

Issue

Section

Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)