Diseño de edificios de oficinas sustentables para promover ocupantes sustentables
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22320/07190700.2021.11.02.03Palabras clave:
Diseño sustentable, Edificios de oficinas, Sistemas de certificación en la sustentabilidad, Comportamiento pro-ambientalResumen
Escasos son los trabajos que se enfocan en investigar el potencial de los edificios sustentables de promover sustentabilidad en sus ocupantes. Por ello, el siguiente estudio tiene como objetivo analizar el uso de créditos LEED para fomentar comportamientos pro-ambientales. La metodología utilizada es de carácter exploratoria y de lógica descriptiva, y analiza comparativamente edificios de oficinas certificados LEED [Argentina (n= 351), Chile (n= 494), Colombia (n= 432), Perú (n= 282)] en el período 2012-2020. Los resultados revelaron que los créditos más empleados fueron: “Acceso a Transporte Público” (99,34%), “Densidad del Entorno” (98,34%) y “Pautas de diseño y construcción para inquilinos” (96,53%); y los menos empleados: “Puesta en servicio mejorada” (44,30%), “Luz diurna” (31,31%) y “Controlabilidad de los sistemas” (7,53%). Se concluye, finalmente, que aquellos que optan por incluir al ocupante en el diseño, eligen intervenir en la cultura, mientras que quienes optan por no hacerlo, eligen la tecnología.
Descargas
Citas
AHMED, M., ABUL HASAN, M. Y MALLICK, J. (2016). World Green Building Rating Systems: A Comparative Study. En International Conference Cum Exhibition On Building Utilities 2016. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323771840
AJZEN, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
BAMBERG, S. Y MÖSER, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
BOLTON, L. E., COHEN, J. B. Y BLOOM, P. N. (2006). Does Marketing Products as Remedies Create “Get Out of Jail Free Cards”? Journal of Consumer Research, 33(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1086/504137
BRAGER, G. Y BAKER, L. (2009). Occupant satisfaction in mixed-mode buildings. Building Research and Information, 37(4), 369–380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210902899785
BROWNE Y FRAME, I. (1999). Green buildings need green occupants. Eco-Management and Auditing, 6(2), 80–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0925(199906)6:2<80::aid-ema102>3.0.co;2-#
BUSO, T., FABI, V., ANDERSEN, R. K. Y CORGNATI, S. (2015). Occupant behaviour and robustness of building design. Building and Environment, 94, 694–703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.11.003
CATLIN, J. R. Y WANG, Y. (2013). Recycling gone bad: When the option to recycle increases resource consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(1), 122–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.04.001
Chile GBC (2020). Reporte Construccion Sustentable Chile GBC - Diciembre 2020. Recuperado de www.chilegbc.cl
CHWIEDUK, D. (2003). Towards sustainable-energy buildings. Applied Energy, 76(1–3), 211–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-2619(03)00059-X
COLE, L. B. (2013). The Green Building as a Medium for Environmental Education. Michigan Journal of Sustainability, 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mjs.12333712.0001.012
COLE, L. B. (2014). The Teaching Green School Building: a framework for linking architecture and environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 20(6), 836–857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.833586
COLE, L. B. (2018). The Teaching Green Building: Five Theoretical Perspectives. En W. Leal Filho, R. W. Marans y J. Callewaert (Eds.), Handbook of Sustainability and Social Science Research (pp. 107–125). Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67122-2_6
COLE, L. B. Y HAMILTON, E. M. (2019). Can a green school building teach? A pre- and post-occupancy evaluation of a teaching green school building. Environment and Behavior, 52(10), 1047-1078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518825283
COLE, R. J. (1999). Building environmental assessment methods: Clarifying intentions. Building Research and Information, 27(4–5), 230–246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/096132199369354
COLE, R. J. (2002). Emerging trends in building environmental assessment methods. Building Research & Information, 26(1), 3–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/096132198370065
CRANZ, G., LINDSAY, G., MORHAYIM, L. Y LIN, A. (2014). Communicating Sustainability: A Postoccupancy Evaluation of the David Brower Center. Environment and Behavior, 46(7), 826–847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513475449
D’OCA, S., HONG, T. Y LANGEVIN, J. (2018). The human dimensions of energy use in buildings: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, pp. 731–742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.019
DE DEAR, R. J. Y BRAGER, G. (2002). Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: Revisions to ASHRAE Standard 55. Energy and Buildings, 34(6), 549–561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00005-1
DEUBLE, M. P. (2007). Green Occupants for Green Buildings. Macquarie.
DEUBLE, M. P. Y DE DEAR, R. J. (2012). Green occupants for green buildings: The missing link? Building and Environment, 56(56), 21–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.02.029
DEUBLE, M. P. Y DE DEAR, R. J. (2009). Do green buildings need green occupants? En Proceedings of Healthy Buildings 2009 (pp. 843–846). Recuperado de https://researchers.mq.edu.au/en/publications/do-green-buildings-need-green-occupants
DING, G. K. C. C. (2008). Sustainable construction-The role of environmental assessment tools. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(3), 451–464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.025
DUNLAP, R. E. Y VAN LIERE, K. D. (1978). The “new environmental paradigm”. Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875
DUNLAP, R. E., VAN LIERE, K. D., MERTIG, A. G. Y JONES, R. E. (2000). New Trends in Measuring Environmental Attitudes: Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176
FABI, V., ANDERSEN, R. Y CORGNATI, S. (2011). Description of occupant behaviour in building energy simulation: state-of-art and concepts for improvements. Building Simulation 2011: 12th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, Sydney, 14-16 November, 2882–2889.
FOUNTAIN, M., BRAGER, G. Y DE DEAR, R. (1996). E IE| GY AHD BUILDIPIG Expectations of indoor climate control. Energy and Buildings, 24(3), 179-182.
FRONDEL, M. (2004). Guest editorial: Energy conservation, the rebound effect, and future energy and transport technologies: An introduction to energy conservation and the rebound effect. International Journal of Energy Technology and Policy, 2(3), 203–208.
GARROTE, P. R. Y ROJAS, M. DEL C. (2015). La validación por juicio de expertos: dos investigaciones cualitativas en Lingüística aplicada. Revista Nebrija de Lingüística Aplicada a la Enseñanza de Lenguas, 18, 124–139.
GOU, Z. (2016). Green building for office interiors: challenges and opportunities. Facilities, 34(11–12), 614–629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/F-04-2015-0022
GOU, Z. (2019). Human Factors in Green Building: Building Types and Users’ Needs. Buildings, 9(1), 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9010017
GOU, Z., PRASAD, D. Y SIU-YU LAU, S. (2013). Are green buildings more satisfactory and comfortable? Habitat International, 39, 156–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.12.007
GROSSMANN, D., GALVIN, R., WEISS, J., MADLENER, R. Y HIRSCHL, B. (2016). A methodology for estimating rebound effects in non-residential public service buildings: Case study of four buildings in Germany. Energy and Buildings, 111, 455-467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.11.063
HARLAND, P., STAATS, H. Y WILKE, H. A. M. (1999). Explaining Proenvironmental Intention and Behavior by Personal Norms and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of applied social psychology, 29(12), 2505-2528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00123.x
HEERWAGEN, J. (2000). Green buildings, organizational success and occupant productivity. Building Research and Information, 28(5–6), 353–367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/096132100418500
HERNÁNDEZ SAMPIERI, R., FERNÁNDEZ COLLADO, C. Y DEL PILAR BAPTISTA LUCIO, M. (2010). Metodología de la Investigación. México D.F: McGraw Hill.
HILL, A., HAN, Y., TAYLOR, J. E., SHEALY, T., PEARCE, A. Y MOHAMMADI, N. (2019). Empirical examination of pro-environmental behaviors in traditional, green featured and LEED certified buildings. Energy Procedia, 158, 3982–3987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.843
HOFFMAN, A. Y HENN, R. (2008). Overcoming the Social and Psychological Barriers to Green Building. Organization & Environment, 21(4), 390–419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026608326129
HONG, T., YAN, D., D’OCA, S. Y CHEN, C. (2017). Ten questions concerning occupant behavior in buildings: The big picture. Building and Environment, 114, 518–530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.006
HOPWOOD, B., MELLOR, M. Y O’BRIEN, G. (2005). Sustainable development: Mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development, 13(1), 38–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.244
HOSTETLER, M. Y NOISEUX, K. (2010). Are green residential developments attracting environmentally savvy homeowners? Landscape and Urban Planning, 94(3–4), 234–243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.008
ILLANKOON, I. M. C. S., TAM, V. W. Y., LE, K. N. Y SHEN, L. (2017). Key credit criteria among international green building rating tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 209–220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.206
KARJALAINEN, S. (2016). Should we design buildings that are less sensitive to occupant behaviour? A simulation study of effects of behaviour and design on office energy consumption. Energy Efficiency, 9(6), 1257–1270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-015-9422-7
KARJALAINEN, S. Y KOISTINEN, O. (2007). User problems with individual temperature control in offices. Building and Environment, 42(8), 2880–2887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.031
KHASHE, S., HEYDARIAN, A., GERBER, D., BECERIK-GERBER, B., HAYES, T. Y WOOD, W. (2015). Influence of LEED branding on building occupants’ pro-environmental behavior. Building and Environment, 94, 477–488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.10.005
KIRK, J. L. (2010). Sustainable environments and pro-environmental behavior. University of Nebraska at Lincoln. Recuperado de http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/arch_id_theseshttp://digitalcommons.unl.edu/arch_id_theses/2
KOLLMUSS, A. Y AGYEMAN, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
LABARTINO, I. (2018). Building certification as a driver in green building design: The holistic apporach of WELL. Stockholm: KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment.
LEAMAN, A. Y BORDASS, B. (2001). Assessing building performance in use 4: The Probe occupant surveys and their implications. Building Research and Information, 29(2), 129–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210010008045
LEE, Y. S. (2010). Office layout affecting privacy, interaction, and acoustic quality in LEED-certified buildings. Building and Environment, 45(7), 1594–1600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.01.007
LINDENBERG, S. Y STEG, L. (2007). Normative, Gain and Hedonic Goal Frames Guiding Environmental Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 63 (117-137). DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00499.x
MATTINZIOLI, T., SOL-SÁNCHEZ, M., MORENO, B., ALEGRE, J. Y MARTÍNEZ, G. (2020). Sustainable building rating systems: A critical review for achieving a common consensus. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 51(5), 512–534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2020.1732781
MCCUNN, L. J. Y GIFFORD, R. (2012). Do green offices affect employee engagement and environmental attitudes? In Architectural Science Review, 55(2), 128–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2012.667939
MOEZZI, M. (2009). Are comfort expectations of building occupants too high? Building Research and Information, 37(1), 79–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210802611009
MOKHTAR, N. S. Y WILKINSON, S. (2015). Motivation Factors in Energy Saving Behaviour between Occupants in Green and Conventional Buildings — Malaysia Case Study. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 6(7), 491–497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7763/ijesd.2015.v6.643
MOKHTAR, N. S., WILKINSON, S. Y FASSMAN, E. (2015). Strategies for improving energy saving behaviour in commercial buildings in Malaysia. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 22(1), 73–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-04-2014-0054
NAGY, Z., YONG, F. Y., FREI, M. Y SCHLUETER, A. (2015). Occupant centered lighting control for comfort and energy efficient building operation. Energy and Buildings, 94, 100–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.02.053
O’BRIEN, W. (2013). Occupant-proof buildings: can we design buildings that are robust against occupant behaviour. 13th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, Chambéry, France, August 26-28 (pp. 746–1754).
PALME, M., ISALGUE, A., COCH-ROURA, H., SERRA, R. Y COCH, H. (2006). Robust design: A way to control energy use from the human behaviour in architectural spaces. En PLEA 2006 - 23rd International Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Conference Proceedings, September (pp. I311–I316).
PIERSON, L. (2020). Building for Wellness-Healthy Building Course for Cal Poly SLO CM Department. Recuperado de https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cmsp/365/
RAMKISSOON, H., WEILER, B. Y SMITH, L. D. G. (2012). Place attachment and pro-environmental behaviour in national parks: The development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 20(2), 257–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.602194
RASHID, M., SPRECKELMEYER, K., & ANGRISANO, N. J. (2012). Green buildings, environmental awareness, and organizational image. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 14(1), 21–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14630011211231428
SAMANI, S. A. (2015). The impact of personal control over office workspace on environmental satisfaction and performance. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(3), 163-175. Recuperado de http://www.aiscience.org/journal/jssh
SORRELL, S. (2007). The rebound effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency. Australian family physician, 42(4). UK Energy Research Centre. DOI: https://doi.org/1-903144-0-35
STAZI, F. Y NASPI, F. (2018). Impact of Occupants’ Behaviour on Zero-Energy Buildings. Cham: SpringerBriefs in Energy.
STEINBERG, D., PATCHAN, M., SCHUNN, C. Y LANDIS, A. (2009). Determining Adequate Information for Green Building Occupant Training Materials. Journal of Green Building, 4(3), 143–150.
STERN, P. C. (2000). Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424.
TEZEL, E. Y GIRITLI, H. (2019). Understanding pro-environmental workplace behavior: a comparative study. Facilities, 37(9–10), 669–683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/F-12-2017-0134
USGBC (2016). LEED 2009 for Core and Shell Development Rating System. Recuperado de https://www.usgbc.org/resources/leed-2009-core-and-shell-current-version
VAN DEN BROM, P., MEIJER, A. Y VISSCHER, H. (2016). Reducing the performance gap by analysing specific combinations of occupant and building characteristics. En 4th European Conference on Behaviour and Energy Efficiency (Behave 2016), September, 8–9. Recuperado de http://pure.tudelft.nl/ws/files/10412927/Brom_Meijer_Visscher.pdf
VINE, E., LEE, E., CLEAR, R., DIBARTOLOMEO, D. Y SELKOWITZ, S. (1998). Office worker response to an automated venetian blind and electric lighting system: a pilot study. Energy and Buildings, 28(2), 205–218.
WAGNER, A., GOSSAUER, E., MOOSMANN, C., GROPP, T. Y LEONHART, R. (2007). Thermal comfort and workplace occupant satisfaction-Results of field studies in German low energy office buildings. Energy and Buildings, 39(7), 758–769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.02.013
WEN, B., MUSA, N., ONN, C. C., RAMESH, S., LIANG, L. Y WANG, W. (2020). Evolution of sustainability in global green building rating tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120912
WU, S. R. (2016). Green buildings and green users: an assessment of using green building environments to communicate sustainability to users. Michigan: Michigan State.
WU, S. R., GREAVES, M., CHEN, J. Y GRADY, S. C. (2017). Green buildings need green occupants: a research framework through the lens of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Architectural Science Review, 60(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2016.1197097
WU, S. R., GREEN, M., CHEN, J., TANG, Y. Y YANG, A. (2015). Green building design and visual persuasion on occupants’ pro - environmental behaviours. Living and Learning: Research for a Better Built Environment, 49th International Conference of the Architectural Science Association, 133–142.
WU, S. R., KIM, S.-K., PARK, H., FAN, P., LIGMANN-ZIELINSKA, A. Y CHEN, J. (2017). How do green buildings communicate green design to building users? A survey study of a leed-certified building. Journal of Green Building, 12(3), 85–100. DOI: https://doi.org/doi.org/10.3992/1943-4618.12.3.85
XUE, F., LAU, S. S. Y., GOU, Z., SONG, Y. Y JIANG, B. (2019). Incorporating biophilia into green building rating tools for promoting health and wellbeing. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 76, 98–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.02.004
ZUO, J. Y ZHAO, Z. Y. (2014). Green building research-current status and future agenda: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 271–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.021
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Fernando Chavez-Finol, Maureen Trebilcock-Kelly, María Beatriz Piderit-Moreno
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
El contenido de los artículos que se publican en cada número de Hábitat Sustentable, es responsabilidad exclusiva de los autores y no representan necesariamente el pensamiento ni comprometen la opinión de la Universidad del Bío-Bío.
Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de Reconocimiento de Creative Commons CC BY-SA que permite a otros compartir-copiar, transformar o crear nuevo material a partir de esta obra con fines no comerciales, siempre y cuando se reconozcan la autoría y la primera publicación en esta revista, y sus nuevas creaciones estén bajo una licencia con los mismos términos.
Programa de Información Científica/Concurso Fondos de Publicación de Revistas Científicas 2018/ Proyecto Mejoramiento de Visibilidad de Revistas UBB (Código:FP180007) 
