Application of the “Footprint Family” for the environmental evaluation of public buildings in Spain. case study: educational center
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22320/07190700.2021.11.01.06Keywords:
Construction engineering, Environmental impact, Environmental indicatorsAbstract
Within the commitments of the 2030 Agenda, the socio-economic objectives for a sustainable development of society as a whole, stand out, which propose minimizing the impact produced by all the activities of the Public Administration on the environment. Therefore, the creation and retrofitting of its infrastructures, needed for its operation and the services it provides, has a great impact. The goal of this work focuses on a methodological adaptation for the environmental evaluation of the works promoted by public organizations, quantifying and locating the sources of impact with the purpose of taking the measures to minimize them. For this, the footprint family, ecological, carbon, and water, are proposed as indicators, characterized by the simplicity of their message and the ease of their implementation in the construction sector, by controlling project costs. A case study is presented, the construction of an early childhood education center in the city of Madrid, for which the data needed for the calculation are presented and analyzed. The results reflect interesting information in terms of footprints, on the elements that must be controlled and improved in the project design, such as concrete and steel.
Downloads
References
ALLAN, J. A. (1993). Fortunately there are Substitutes for Water Otherwise our Hydro-political Futures would be Impossible. En Priorities for Water Resources Allocation and Management (13-26). London: ODA.
ALMASI, A. M. Y MILIOS, L. (2013). Municipal waste management in Spain. European Environment Agency. Recuperado de https://www.eea.europa.eu/ds_resolveuid/UD8Z6VW5GB
BARBERO ARRABÉ, I. (2018). Proyecto de construcción de Centro de Educación Infantil. Madrid: Centro de Proyectos del Ejército. Dirección de Infraestructura (DIIN).
BARE, J., HOFSTETTER, P., PENNINGTON, D.W. Y UDO DE HAES, H.A. (2000). Life cycle impact assessment workshop summary. Midpoints versus endpoints: the sacrifices and benefits. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 5(6), 319-326.
BELTRÁN, M. J. Y VELÁZQUEZ, E. (2015). La ecología política del agua virtual y huella hídrica. Reflexiones sobre la necesidad de un análisis crítico de los indicadores de flujos virtuales de agua en la economía. Revista de Economía Crítica, (20). Recuperado de http://www.revistaeconomiacritica.org/node/770
COMISIÓN NACIONAL DEL MERCADO Y LA COMPETENCIA (2019). Radiografía de los procedimientos de contratación pública en España. Madrid: Comisión Nacional de los Mercados y la Competencia. Recuperado de https://www.cnmc.es/expedientes/ecnmc00418
CHASTAS, P., THEODOSIOU, T., KONTOLEON, K. J. Y BIKAS, D., (2018). Normalizing and assessing carbon emissions in the building sector: A review on the embodied CO2 emissions of residential buildings. Building and Environment, 130, 212–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.12.032
CRAWFORD, R. H. Y PULLEN, S. (2011). Life cycle water analysis of a residential building and its occupants. Building Research and Information, 39(6), 589-602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2011.584212
DOSSCHE, C., BOEL, V. Y DE CORTE, W. (2017). Use of life cycle assessments in the construction sector: critical review. Procedia Engineering, 171, 302-311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.338
ECOINVENT CENTER (2013). Ecoinvent database v3 Ecoinvent Report. Recuperado de www.ecoinvent.org
EMASESA (2005). Sostenibilidad y Gestión. Éramos así, así somos (1975-2005). Recuperado de https://www.emasesa.com/asi-eramos-asi-somos-1975-2005/
FÉRRIZ PAPÍ, J.A. (2012). Water consumption in buildings: Embebed water in construction materials. Trabajo presentado en 1st International Congress on Water, Waste and Energy Management. Salamanca. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277716798_Water_Consumption_in_Buildings_Embebed_Water_in_Construction_Materials
FREIRE GUERRERO, A., ALBA RODRÍGUEZ, Mª D. Y MARRERO MELÉNDEZ, M. (2019). A budget for the ecological footprint of buildings is possible: a case study using the dwelling construction cost database of Andalusia. Sustainable Cities and Society, 51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101737
FREIRE GUERRERO, A. Y MARRERO, M. (2015a). Ecological Footprint in Indirect Costs of Construction. Proceedings of the II International congress on sustainable construction and eco-efficient solutions: Seville 25-27 may 2015 (pp. 969-980). Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/11441/59685
FREIRE GUERRERO, A. Y MARRERO, M. (2015b). Evaluación a través del presupuesto de la energía incorporada al proyecto de edificación. Revista Hábitat Sustentable, 5(1), 54-63. Recuperado de http://revistas.ubiobio.cl/index.php/RHS/article/view/1812
FUNDACIÓN GENERAL DE LA UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID (2010). Cambio Global España 2020/50. Sector edificación. Programa Cambio Global España 2020/50 del Centro Complutense de Estudios e Información Medioambiental. Madrid.
GENG, R., MANSOURI, A. Y AKTAS, E. (2017). The relationship between green supply chain management and performance: A meta-analysis of empirical evidences in Asian emerging economies. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.10.008
GONZÁLEZ VALLEJO. P, MUÑOZ SANGUINETTI C. Y MARRERO MELÉNDEZ, M, (2019). Environmental and economic assessment of dwelling construction in Spain and Chile. A comparative analysis of two representative case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 621-635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.063
GONZÁLEZ VALLEJO, P. (2017). Evaluación económica y ambiental de la construcción de edificios residenciales. Aplicación a España y Chile. Tesis doctoral de Arquitectura, Universidad de Sevilla.
GONZÁLEZ VALLEJO, P., MARRERO, M. Y SOLÍS GUZMÁN, J. (2015). The ecological footprint of dwelling construction in Spain. Ecological Indicators, 52, 75-84, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.11.016.
GRUNEWALD, N., GALLI, A., KATSUNORI, I., HALLE, M. Y GRESSOT, M. (2015). The Ecological Footprint of Mediterranean Diets. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275349456_The_Ecological_Footprint_of_Mediterranean_Diets
IDAE (2011). Factores de Emisión de CO2. Recuperado de https://www.idae.es/informacion-y-publicaciones
INSTITUTO DE TECNOLOGÍA DE LA CONSTRUCCIÓN DE CATALUÑA (ITEC) (2013). Recuperado de http://www.itec.es/nouBedec.e/bedec.aspx (accessed on Dec 3, 2013).
KAIRIES ALVARADO, D., MUÑOZ SANGUINETTI, C. Y MARTÍNEZ ROCAMORA, A., (2021). Contribution of energy efficiency standards to life-cycle carbon footprint reduction in public buildings in Chile, Energy and Buildings, 236, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110797
LAURENT, A. Y OWSIANIAK, M. (2017). Potentials and limitations of footprints for gauging environmental sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 25, 20-27, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.04.003
MARTÍNEZ-ROCAMORA, A., SOLÍS-GUZMÁN, J. Y MARRERO, M. (2016a). LCA databases focused on
construction materials: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 565-573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.243
MARTÍNEZ-ROCAMORA, A., SOLÍS-GUZMÁN, J. Y MARRERO, M. (2016b). Toward the Ecological Footprint of the use and maintenance phase of buildings: Utility consumption and cleaning tasks. Ecological Indicators, 69, 66–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.007
MARRERO, M. Y RAMÍREZ DE ARELLANO, A. (2010). The building cost system in Andalusia: application to construction and demolition waste management. Construction Management and Economics, 28(5), 495-507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446191003735500
MARRERO, M., RIVERO, C. Y ALBA, Mª D. (2020). What are we discarding during the life cycle of a building? Case studies of social housing in Andalusia, Spain. Waste Management: international journal of integrated waste management, science and technology, 102, 391-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.11.002
MCCORMACK, M., TRELOAR, G.J., PALMOWSKI, L. Y CRAWFORD, R. (2007). Modelling direct and indirect water requirements of construction. Building Research and Information, 35(2), 156-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210601125383
PRÉ SUSTAINABILITY (2016). Simapro 8. Recuperado de https://simapro.com/
REE (2014-2018). El Sistema Eléctrico Español / The Spanish Electric System. Recuperado de https://www.ree.es/es/datos/publicaciones/informe-anual-sistema/informe-delsistema-electrico-espanol-2018
RIVERO, C. (2020). Estudio de Huellas en el Ciclo de Vida del Edificio Residencial. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de Sevilla.
VANHAM, D., LEIP, A., GALLI, A., KASTNER, T., BRUCKNER, M., UWIZEYE, A., VAN DIJK, K., … Y HOEKSTRA, A. (2019). Environmental footprint family to address local to planetary sustainability and deliver on the SDGs. Science of The Total Environment, 693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133642
VELÁZQUEZ, E., MADRID, C. Y BELTRÁN, M. J. (2011). Rethinking concepts of virtual water and water footprint in relation to the production–consumption binomial and the water–energy nexus. Water Resources Management, 25, 743–761. DOI:10.1007/s11269-010-9724-7
ZHANG, L., DZAKPASU, M., CHEN, R. Y WANG, X. (2017). Validity and utility of ecological footprint accounting: A stateof-the-art review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 32, 411-416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.04.016
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Cristina Rivero-Camacho, Antonio Ferreira-Sanchez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The content of articles which are published in each edition of Habitat Sustentable, is the exclusive responsibility of the author(s) and does not necessarily represent the thinking or compromise the opinion of University of the Bio-Bio.
The author(s) conserve their copyright and guarantee to the journal, the right of first publication of their work. This will simultaneously be subject to the Creative Commons Recognition License CC BY-SA, which allows others to share-copy, transform or create new materials from this work for non-commercial purposes, as long as they recognize authorship and the first publication in this journal, and its new creations are under a license with the same terms.