Comparación de los cortavientos tradicionales y contemporáneos en zonas climáticas cálidas y secas y cálidas y húmedas

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22320/07190700.2025.15.02.02

Palabras clave:

sistemas cortavientos, arquitectura sensible al clima, eficiencia energética, refrigeración pasiva, armonía visual, arquitectura tradicional, diseño sostenible de fachadas

Resumen

El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar comparativamente los sistemas de cortavientos tradicionales y contemporáneos utilizados en regiones climáticas cálidas y áridas, y cálidas y húmedas, en términos de eficacia estructural, eficiencia energética y armonía visual con el paisaje. La investigación adopta un marco simplificado de análisis de decisiones multicriterio (MCDA) integrado con un sistema de calificación de escala Likert, aplicado a ocho casos de asentamientos distintos. Los resultados revelan que los sistemas tradicionales presentan una alta eficiencia en la ventilación pasiva y una morfología que responde al clima. Por el contrario, los sistemas contemporáneos demuestran ventajas en cuanto a eficiencia energética gracias al uso de materiales sostenibles y soluciones tecnológicas avanzadas. Sin embargo, las aplicaciones contemporáneas tienden a mostrar una integración visual limitada con el contexto local y una mayor dependencia de los sistemas mecánicos. Al integrar los conocimientos medioambientales tradicionales con enfoques de diseño contemporáneos orientados al clima, este estudio ofrece una perspectiva global y multiescalar, lo que constituye una contribución innovadora a las estrategias de diseño arquitectónico sostenible.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Pelin Akin, Universidade Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam, Kahramanmaraş, Turquia

Doctor en Filosofía
Asistente de investigación (doctorado), Facultad de Ingeniería y Arquitectura, Departamento de Arquitectura

Elvan Kumtepe, Universidad Süleyman Demirel, Isparta, Turquía

Doctor en Filosofía
Asistente de investigación (doctorado), Facultad de Arquitectura, Departamento de Arquitectura

Citas

AL-HOMOUD, M.S. (2004). The Effectiveness of Thermal Insulation in Different Types of Buildings in Hot Climates. Journal of Building Physics, 27(3), 235 - 247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097196304038368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1097196304038368

AL-AJMI, F., LOVEDAY, D. L., & HANBY, V. I. (2006). The cooling potential of earth–air heat exchangers for domestic buildings in a desert climate. Building and Environment, 41(3), 235-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.01.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.01.027

ALMESBAH, M., & WANG, J. (2025). Review of Dynamic Building Envelope Systems and Technologies Utilizing Renewable Energy Resources. Designs, 9(2), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs9020041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/designs9020041

AKGÜN, Y. (2021). Contemporary Adaptive Systems in Architecture and Structural Engineering: State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Proceedings of the International Conference of Contemporary Affairs in Architecture and Urbanism-ICCAUA, 4(1), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.38027/ICCAUA2021165N10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.38027/ICCAUA2021165N10

ARSLAN, H. D., & YILDIRIM, K. (2023). Perceptual evaluation of stadium façades. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 66, 391-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.11.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.11.015

ASCIONE, F., BIANCO, N., DE MASI, R. F., MAURO, G. M., & VANOLI, G. P. (2015). Design of the Building Envelope: A Novel Multi-Objective Approach for the Optimization of Energy Performance and Thermal Comfort. Sustainability, 7(8), 10809-10836. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70810809 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su70810809

BAGASI, A. A., CALAUTIT, J. K., & KARBAN, A. S. (2021). Evaluation of the Integration of the Traditional Architectural Element Mashrabiya into the Ventilation Strategy for Buildings in Hot Climates. Energies, 14(3), 530. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14030530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14030530

BAHADORI, M. N. (2018). Passive cooling systems in Iranian architecture in B. Sorensen (Ed.), Renewable energy: Four Volume Set (1 ed., Vol. 1, pp. 87-101). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315793245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315793245-10

BELTON, V., & STEWART, T. J. (2012). Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4

BIENVENIDO-HUERTAS, D., OLIVEIRA, M., RUBIO-BELLIDO, C., & MARÍN, D. (2019). A Comparative Analysis of the International Regulation of Thermal Properties in Building Envelope. Sustainability, 11(20), 5574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205574 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205574

BOONE, H. N., & BOONE, D. A. (2012). Analyzing Likert data. The Journal of Extension, 50(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.50.02.48 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.50.02.48

CHOHAN, A. H., AWAD, J., ELKAHLOUT, Y., & ABUARKUB, M. (2024). Evaluating windcatchers in UAE heritage architecture: A pathway to zero-energy cooling solutions. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 15(10), 102936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.102936 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.102936

DEWALLE, D. R., & HEISLER, G. M. (1988). 14. Use of windbreaks for home energy conservation. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 22-23, 243-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(88)90024-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(88)90024-2

EL-SHORBAGY, A. M. (2010). Design with nature: windcatcher as a paradigm of natural ventilation device in buildings. International Journal of Civil & Environmental Engineering IJCEE-IJENS, 10(03), 26-31. https://www.idc-online.com/technical_references/pdfs/civil_engineering/Design%20with.pdf

GHOULEM, M., EL MOUEDDEB, K., NEHDI, E., ZHONG, F., & CALAUTIT, J. (2020). Design of a Passive Downdraught Evaporative Cooling Windcatcher (PDEC-WC) System for Greenhouses in Hot Climates. Energies, 13(11), 2934. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112934 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112934

GIVONI, B. (1998). Climate considerations in building and urban design. John Wiley & Sons.

HEMMATZADEH, Z., & AKGÜÇ, A. (2023). A Comparison of Traditional and Contemporary Buildings by Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emission: A Case-Study from Tabriz-Iran. International Journal of Innovative Engineering Applications, 7(1), 62-75. https://doi.org/10.46460/ijiea.1161259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46460/ijiea.1161259

HEJAZI, B., & HEJAZI, M. (2014). Persian Wind Towers: Architecture, Cooling Performance, and Seismic Behaviour. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 9(1), 56-70. https://doi.org/10.2495/DNE-V9-N1-56-70 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2495/DNE-V9-N1-56-70

JASSIM, J. A. A. W. (2018). A new design of the minaret as a two-sides wind catcher integrated with the wing wall for passive evaporative cooling in hot climates. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 13(11), 3856-3873. https://jestec.taylors.edu.my/Vol%2013%20issue%2011%20November%202018/13_11_29.pdf

JOSHI, A., KALE, S., CHANDEL, S., & PAL, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396-403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975

KABOŠOVÁ, L., FOGED, I. W., KMET, S., & KATUNSKY, D. (2019). Hybrid design method for wind-adaptive architecture. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 17(4), 307-322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478077119886528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1478077119886528

KAVERIN, V., NURMAGANBETOVA, G., EM, G., ISSENOV, S., TATKEYEVA, G., & MAUSSYMBAYEVA, A. (2024). Combined Wind Turbine Protection System. Energies, 17(20), 5074. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17205074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17205074

KITSOPOULOU, A., BELLOS, E., & TZIVANIDIS, C. (2024). An Up-to-Date Review of Passive Building Envelope Technologies for Sustainable Design. Energies, 17(16), 4039. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17164039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17164039

KUMAR, D., ALAM, M., MEMON, R. A., & BHAYO, B. A. (2022). A critical review for formulation and conceptualization of an ideal building envelope and novel sustainability framework for building applications. Cleaner engineering and technology, 11, 100555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100555

LOTFABADI, P., & HANÇER, P. (2019). A Comparative Study of Traditional and Contemporary Building Envelope Construction Techniques in Terms of Thermal Comfort and Energy Efficiency in Hot and Humid Climates. Sustainability, 11(13), 3582. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133582 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133582

MA, Q., QIAN, G., YU, M., LI, L., & WEI, X. (2024). Performance of Windcatchers in Improving Indoor Air Quality, Thermal Comfort, and Energy Efficiency: A Review. Sustainability, 16(20), 9039. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16209039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16209039

MALEWCZYK, M., TARASZKIEWICZ, A., & CZYŻ, P. (2024). Visual Perception of Regularity and the Composition Pattern Type of the Facade. Buildings, 14(5), 1389. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14051389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14051389

MARDANI, A., JUSOH, A., & ZAVADSKAS, E. K. (2015). Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications–Two decades review from 1994 to 2014. Expert systems with Applications, 42(8), 4126-4148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003

MARGOLIS, L., & ROBINSON, A. (2007). Living systems: innovative materials and technologies for landscape architecture. Birkhäuser Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8297-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8297-1

MUME, I. D., & WORKALEMAHU, S. (2021). Review on windbreaks agroforestry as a climate smart agriculture practices. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 9(6), 342-347. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12

NAGHIPOUR, P., & BAKIROVA, T. (2024 March 7). Investigating windcatcher in sustainable traditional architecture and its impact in clean energy (Case Study: Yazd and Sirjan Cities in Iran). 3rd International Conference on Architecture, Civil Engineering, Urban Development, Environment and Horizons of Islamic Art, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran. https://isnac.ir/XGCA-HKABA

NARBUTS, J., & VANAGA, R. (2023). Revolutionizing the building envelope: a comprehensive scientific review of innovative technologies for reduced emissions. Environmental and Climate Technologies, 27(1), 724-737. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0053

PERINO, M., & SERRA, V. (2015). Switching from static to adaptable and dynamic building envelopes: A paradigm shift for the energy efficiency in buildings. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, 3(2), 143-163. https://doi.org/10.7480/jfde.2015.2.1015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/FDE-150039

RADHA, C. H., & KISTELEGDI, I. (2016, March 26-27). Efficient natural ventilation in traditional and contemporary houses in hot and dry climate. Proc. of 2nd International Conference on Architecture, Structure and Civil Engineering (pp. 67-75). http://dx.doi.org/10.17758/UR.U0316317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17758/UR.U0316317

REICHE, D. (2010). Renewable energy policies in the Gulf countries: A case study of the carbon-neutral “Masdar City” in Abu Dhabi. Energy policy, 38(1), 378-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.028

SAATY, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98. https://www.inderscience.com/info/inarticle.php?artid=17590 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590

SAFIKHANI, T., & BAHARVAND, M. (2017). Evaluating the Effective Distance Between Living Walls and Wall Surfaces. Energy and Buildings, 150, 498–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.06.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.06.029

SIRROR, H. (2024). Innovative Approaches to Windcatcher Design: A Review on Balancing Tradition Sustainability and Modern Technologies for Enhanced Performance. Energies, 17(22), 5770. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17225770 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17225770

SOFLAEE, F., & SHOKOUHIAN, M. (2005, May). Natural cooling systems in sustainable traditional architecture of Iran. International Conference Passive and Low Energy Cooling For The Built Environment (PALENC 2005), Greece, Santorini. https://www.aivc.org/sites/default/files/members_area/medias/pdf/Inive/palenc/2005/Soflaee.pdf

TOLASA, D. G., & FURI, A. T. (2025). The role of advanced materials in the optimization of wind energy systems: A physics-based approach. Acceleron Aerospace Journal, 4(1), 847-857. https://doi.org/10.61359/11.2106-2504 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61359/11.2106-2504

TRIANTAPHYLLOU, E. (2000). Multi-criteria decision making methods in E. Triantaphyllou, Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comparative study (1 ed., pp. 5-21). Springer Nueva York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6_2

WENINGER, T., SCHEPER, S., LACKÓOVÁ, L., KITZLER, B., GARTNER, K., KING, N. W., CORNELIS, W., STRAUSS, P., & MICHEL, K. (2021). Ecosystem services of tree windbreaks in rural landscapes: A systematic review. Environmental Research Letters, 16(10), 103002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1d0d DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1d0d

ZAHRAWI, A. A., & ALY, A. M. (2024). A Review of Agrivoltaic Systems: Addressing Challenges and Enhancing Sustainability. Sustainability, 16(18), 8271. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188271

Publicado

2025-12-30

Cómo citar

Akin, P., & Kumtepe, E. (2025). Comparación de los cortavientos tradicionales y contemporáneos en zonas climáticas cálidas y secas y cálidas y húmedas. Revista Hábitat Sustentable, 15(2), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.22320/07190700.2025.15.02.02

Número

Sección

Artículos