Comparação entre quebra-ventos tradicionais e contemporâneos em zonas climáticas quentes e secas e quentes e úmidas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22320/07190700.2025.15.02.02Palavras-chave:
sistemas de proteção contra o vento, , arquitetura sensível ao clima, eficiência energética, refrigeração passiva, harmonia visual, arquitetura tradicional, design sustentável de fachadasResumo
Este estudo tem como objetivo avaliar, comparativamente, os sistemas tradicionais e contemporâneos de quebra-ventos utilizados em regiões climáticas quentes e áridas e quentes e úmidas, em termos de eficácia estrutural, eficiência energética e harmonia visual com a paisagem. A pesquisa adota uma estrutura simplificada de Análise de Decisão Multicritério (MCDA), integrada a um sistema de classificação em escala Likert, aplicada a oito casos distintos de assentamentos. Os resultados revelam que os sistemas tradicionais apresentam alta eficiência em ventilação passiva e morfologia responsiva ao clima. Em contrapartida, os sistemas contemporâneos demonstram vantagens em termos de eficiência energética graças ao uso de materiais sustentáveis e soluções tecnológicas avançadas. No entanto, as aplicações contemporâneas tendem a apresentar uma integração visual limitada com o contexto local e uma maior dependência de sistemas mecânicos. Ao integrar o conhecimento ambiental tradicional com abordagens contemporâneas de design responsivas ao clima, este estudo oferece uma perspectiva abrangente e multiescalar, contribuindo de forma inovadora para estratégias de design arquitetônico sustentável.
Downloads
Referências
AL-HOMOUD, M.S. (2004). The Effectiveness of Thermal Insulation in Different Types of Buildings in Hot Climates. Journal of Building Physics, 27(3), 235 - 247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097196304038368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1097196304038368
AL-AJMI, F., LOVEDAY, D. L., & HANBY, V. I. (2006). The cooling potential of earth–air heat exchangers for domestic buildings in a desert climate. Building and Environment, 41(3), 235-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.01.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.01.027
ALMESBAH, M., & WANG, J. (2025). Review of Dynamic Building Envelope Systems and Technologies Utilizing Renewable Energy Resources. Designs, 9(2), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs9020041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/designs9020041
AKGÜN, Y. (2021). Contemporary Adaptive Systems in Architecture and Structural Engineering: State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Proceedings of the International Conference of Contemporary Affairs in Architecture and Urbanism-ICCAUA, 4(1), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.38027/ICCAUA2021165N10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.38027/ICCAUA2021165N10
ARSLAN, H. D., & YILDIRIM, K. (2023). Perceptual evaluation of stadium façades. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 66, 391-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.11.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.11.015
ASCIONE, F., BIANCO, N., DE MASI, R. F., MAURO, G. M., & VANOLI, G. P. (2015). Design of the Building Envelope: A Novel Multi-Objective Approach for the Optimization of Energy Performance and Thermal Comfort. Sustainability, 7(8), 10809-10836. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70810809 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su70810809
BAGASI, A. A., CALAUTIT, J. K., & KARBAN, A. S. (2021). Evaluation of the Integration of the Traditional Architectural Element Mashrabiya into the Ventilation Strategy for Buildings in Hot Climates. Energies, 14(3), 530. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14030530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14030530
BAHADORI, M. N. (2018). Passive cooling systems in Iranian architecture in B. Sorensen (Ed.), Renewable energy: Four Volume Set (1 ed., Vol. 1, pp. 87-101). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315793245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315793245-10
BELTON, V., & STEWART, T. J. (2012). Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4
BIENVENIDO-HUERTAS, D., OLIVEIRA, M., RUBIO-BELLIDO, C., & MARÍN, D. (2019). A Comparative Analysis of the International Regulation of Thermal Properties in Building Envelope. Sustainability, 11(20), 5574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205574 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205574
BOONE, H. N., & BOONE, D. A. (2012). Analyzing Likert data. The Journal of Extension, 50(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.50.02.48 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.50.02.48
CHOHAN, A. H., AWAD, J., ELKAHLOUT, Y., & ABUARKUB, M. (2024). Evaluating windcatchers in UAE heritage architecture: A pathway to zero-energy cooling solutions. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 15(10), 102936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.102936 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.102936
DEWALLE, D. R., & HEISLER, G. M. (1988). 14. Use of windbreaks for home energy conservation. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 22-23, 243-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(88)90024-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(88)90024-2
EL-SHORBAGY, A. M. (2010). Design with nature: windcatcher as a paradigm of natural ventilation device in buildings. International Journal of Civil & Environmental Engineering IJCEE-IJENS, 10(03), 26-31. https://www.idc-online.com/technical_references/pdfs/civil_engineering/Design%20with.pdf
GHOULEM, M., EL MOUEDDEB, K., NEHDI, E., ZHONG, F., & CALAUTIT, J. (2020). Design of a Passive Downdraught Evaporative Cooling Windcatcher (PDEC-WC) System for Greenhouses in Hot Climates. Energies, 13(11), 2934. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112934 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112934
GIVONI, B. (1998). Climate considerations in building and urban design. John Wiley & Sons.
HEMMATZADEH, Z., & AKGÜÇ, A. (2023). A Comparison of Traditional and Contemporary Buildings by Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emission: A Case-Study from Tabriz-Iran. International Journal of Innovative Engineering Applications, 7(1), 62-75. https://doi.org/10.46460/ijiea.1161259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46460/ijiea.1161259
HEJAZI, B., & HEJAZI, M. (2014). Persian Wind Towers: Architecture, Cooling Performance, and Seismic Behaviour. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 9(1), 56-70. https://doi.org/10.2495/DNE-V9-N1-56-70 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2495/DNE-V9-N1-56-70
JASSIM, J. A. A. W. (2018). A new design of the minaret as a two-sides wind catcher integrated with the wing wall for passive evaporative cooling in hot climates. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 13(11), 3856-3873. https://jestec.taylors.edu.my/Vol%2013%20issue%2011%20November%202018/13_11_29.pdf
JOSHI, A., KALE, S., CHANDEL, S., & PAL, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396-403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
KABOŠOVÁ, L., FOGED, I. W., KMET, S., & KATUNSKY, D. (2019). Hybrid design method for wind-adaptive architecture. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 17(4), 307-322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478077119886528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1478077119886528
KAVERIN, V., NURMAGANBETOVA, G., EM, G., ISSENOV, S., TATKEYEVA, G., & MAUSSYMBAYEVA, A. (2024). Combined Wind Turbine Protection System. Energies, 17(20), 5074. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17205074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17205074
KITSOPOULOU, A., BELLOS, E., & TZIVANIDIS, C. (2024). An Up-to-Date Review of Passive Building Envelope Technologies for Sustainable Design. Energies, 17(16), 4039. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17164039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17164039
KUMAR, D., ALAM, M., MEMON, R. A., & BHAYO, B. A. (2022). A critical review for formulation and conceptualization of an ideal building envelope and novel sustainability framework for building applications. Cleaner engineering and technology, 11, 100555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100555
LOTFABADI, P., & HANÇER, P. (2019). A Comparative Study of Traditional and Contemporary Building Envelope Construction Techniques in Terms of Thermal Comfort and Energy Efficiency in Hot and Humid Climates. Sustainability, 11(13), 3582. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133582 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133582
MA, Q., QIAN, G., YU, M., LI, L., & WEI, X. (2024). Performance of Windcatchers in Improving Indoor Air Quality, Thermal Comfort, and Energy Efficiency: A Review. Sustainability, 16(20), 9039. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16209039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16209039
MALEWCZYK, M., TARASZKIEWICZ, A., & CZYŻ, P. (2024). Visual Perception of Regularity and the Composition Pattern Type of the Facade. Buildings, 14(5), 1389. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14051389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14051389
MARDANI, A., JUSOH, A., & ZAVADSKAS, E. K. (2015). Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications–Two decades review from 1994 to 2014. Expert systems with Applications, 42(8), 4126-4148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003
MARGOLIS, L., & ROBINSON, A. (2007). Living systems: innovative materials and technologies for landscape architecture. Birkhäuser Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8297-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8297-1
MUME, I. D., & WORKALEMAHU, S. (2021). Review on windbreaks agroforestry as a climate smart agriculture practices. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 9(6), 342-347. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12
NAGHIPOUR, P., & BAKIROVA, T. (2024 March 7). Investigating windcatcher in sustainable traditional architecture and its impact in clean energy (Case Study: Yazd and Sirjan Cities in Iran). 3rd International Conference on Architecture, Civil Engineering, Urban Development, Environment and Horizons of Islamic Art, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran. https://isnac.ir/XGCA-HKABA
NARBUTS, J., & VANAGA, R. (2023). Revolutionizing the building envelope: a comprehensive scientific review of innovative technologies for reduced emissions. Environmental and Climate Technologies, 27(1), 724-737. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0053
PERINO, M., & SERRA, V. (2015). Switching from static to adaptable and dynamic building envelopes: A paradigm shift for the energy efficiency in buildings. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, 3(2), 143-163. https://doi.org/10.7480/jfde.2015.2.1015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/FDE-150039
RADHA, C. H., & KISTELEGDI, I. (2016, March 26-27). Efficient natural ventilation in traditional and contemporary houses in hot and dry climate. Proc. of 2nd International Conference on Architecture, Structure and Civil Engineering (pp. 67-75). http://dx.doi.org/10.17758/UR.U0316317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17758/UR.U0316317
REICHE, D. (2010). Renewable energy policies in the Gulf countries: A case study of the carbon-neutral “Masdar City” in Abu Dhabi. Energy policy, 38(1), 378-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.028
SAATY, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98. https://www.inderscience.com/info/inarticle.php?artid=17590 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
SAFIKHANI, T., & BAHARVAND, M. (2017). Evaluating the Effective Distance Between Living Walls and Wall Surfaces. Energy and Buildings, 150, 498–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.06.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.06.029
SIRROR, H. (2024). Innovative Approaches to Windcatcher Design: A Review on Balancing Tradition Sustainability and Modern Technologies for Enhanced Performance. Energies, 17(22), 5770. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17225770 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17225770
SOFLAEE, F., & SHOKOUHIAN, M. (2005, May). Natural cooling systems in sustainable traditional architecture of Iran. International Conference Passive and Low Energy Cooling For The Built Environment (PALENC 2005), Greece, Santorini. https://www.aivc.org/sites/default/files/members_area/medias/pdf/Inive/palenc/2005/Soflaee.pdf
TOLASA, D. G., & FURI, A. T. (2025). The role of advanced materials in the optimization of wind energy systems: A physics-based approach. Acceleron Aerospace Journal, 4(1), 847-857. https://doi.org/10.61359/11.2106-2504 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61359/11.2106-2504
TRIANTAPHYLLOU, E. (2000). Multi-criteria decision making methods in E. Triantaphyllou, Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comparative study (1 ed., pp. 5-21). Springer Nueva York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6_2
WENINGER, T., SCHEPER, S., LACKÓOVÁ, L., KITZLER, B., GARTNER, K., KING, N. W., CORNELIS, W., STRAUSS, P., & MICHEL, K. (2021). Ecosystem services of tree windbreaks in rural landscapes: A systematic review. Environmental Research Letters, 16(10), 103002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1d0d DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1d0d
ZAHRAWI, A. A., & ALY, A. M. (2024). A Review of Agrivoltaic Systems: Addressing Challenges and Enhancing Sustainability. Sustainability, 16(18), 8271. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188271
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2025 Pelin Akin, Elvan Kumtepe
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-CompartilhaIgual 4.0.
O conteúdo dos artigos publicados em cada número do Habitat Sustentável é da exclusiva responsabilidade dos autores e não representa necessariamente o pensamento ou compromete a opinião da Universidad del Bío-Bío.
Os autores mantêm os seus direitos de autor e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação da sua obra, que está simultaneamente sujeita à Licença de Atribuição Creative Commons CC BY-SA que permite a outros partilhar, transformar ou criar novo material a partir desta obra para fins não comerciais, desde que a autoria e a primeira publicação nesta revista sejam reconhecidas, e as suas novas criações sejam licenciadas sob os mesmos termos.
Programa de Informação Científica/Concurso Fondos de Publicación de Revistas Científicas 2018/ Proyecto Mejoramiento de Visibilidad de Revistas UBB (Código:FP180007)
