City and segregation shaken by capitalism. Critique of the idealist approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22320/07183607.2020.23.42.01Keywords:
neoliberalism, structuralism, idealism, urbanismAbstract
It has always been difficult to define what a city is and now even more so as the boom in real-estate business has subjected it and its peri-urban areas to constant transformation. With this, segregation has also acquired a state of constant mutation and in fact, no longer seems to stabilize itself, as it did in the past, into recognizable spatial patterns. This has been happening in Chilean cities, just as it has in many other countries.Thus, the temptation of substituting physical-geographical and planimetric definitions, both of city and segregation, for others that emphasize processes, is understandable. Does this mean to say then, that the physical-spatial dimension of the city implicitly or explicitly lacks importance as neoliberal economists and urbanist devotees of structural-determinist approaches argue? It is true that the COVID-19 pandemic makes the feebleness of these approaches, which ignore the spatial aspect, patently clear, but this does not make it any less relevant to examine their theoretical setup, which we will do based on a critical review of the specialized literature and testimonies of specialists collected in a research project on segregation in three Chilean cities that we recently finished. We conclude these pages in the need to reinforce empirical research of the city and segregation, just as our attention to their subjective dimensions.
Downloads
References
Bachelard, G. (2000). La formación del espíritu científico; contribución a un psicoanálisis del conocimiento objetivo. México: FCE.
Braudel, F. (1986). La dinámica del capitalismo. Breviarios #427 del Fondo de Cultura Económica. México: FCE.
Brenner, Neil y Schmid, Christian (2016). La "era urbana" en debate. Eure, 42(127), pp.307-339.
Capel, Horacio (2001). Dibujar el mundo. Barcelona: Ediciones del Serbal. Sección “Gritos amargos sobre la ciudad” p. 115-147.
Cardoso, M. (2018). El tamaño de las ciudades. Revista El Economista, noviembre 21 de 2018. Recuperado de https://www.eleconomista.com.mx/opinion/El-tamano-de-las-ciudades-20181120-0142.html
Castells, M. (1974). La cuestión urbana. México: Siglo XXI.
Castells, M. (1988). ¿Hay una sociología urbana? En Bassols, M., Donoso, R., Massolo, A. y Méndez, A. (Comp.), Antología de sociología urbana (pp.491-517).México: UNAM.
Crane, R. y Manville, M. (2008). People or place? Revisiting the who versus the where of urban development. Land Lines, (July), 2-7. Cambridge, Mass: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Dear, M. (Ed.) (2002). From Chicago to LA: Making sense of urban theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Dear, M. (2018). Rodrigo Salcedo y la Escuela de Urbanismo de Los Ángeles.
En Errázuriz, T. y Greene, R. (Eds.), Salcedo (pp. xvii – xxiv). Santiago: Editorial Bifurcaciones.
De Mattos, C. (1999). Santiago de Chile, globalización y expansión metropolitana: lo que existía sigue existiendo. Eure, 25(77), 29-56. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71611999007600002
Diez-Roux, A. (1998). Bringing context back into epidemiology: variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 88(2), 216-222.
Ehrenhalt, A. (2012). The Great Inversion and the Future of the American City. Nueva York: Alfred Knopf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.88.2.216
Fishman, R. (1982). Urban Utopias in the Twentieth Century: Ebenezer Howard, Frank Lloyd Wright, Le Corbusier. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
Fishman, R. (1987). Bourgeois utopias; the rise and fall of suburbia. New York: Basic Books.
Geddes, R. (1997). La metrópolis desbordada: la dispersión de la ciudad americana y la búsqueda de alternativas. Urbana, IV (2), p. 3-11. Recuperado de https://urbanauapp.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Urbana-1997_2.pdf
Glaeser, E. (1993). The political economy of urban development. Independent report prepared under contract to Forestal Valparaíso, S.A., Chile. Boston, Mass.: mimeo.
Glaeser, E. (2011). El triunfo de las ciudades.Madrid: Taurus.
Goodman, J. y Stroup, R. (1991). Progressive Environmentalism: A Pro-Human, Pro-Science, Pro-Free Enterprise Agenda for Change. Task Force Report. Michigan: Mackinac Center for Public Policy.
Gould, S. (1997). Nonoverlapping magisterial. Natural History, 106(March), 16-22.
Greene, R. y De Abrantes, L. (2018). El modo de vida en ciudades no-metropolitanas; disolviendo el binarismo urbano/rural. En Greene, R. (Ed.), Conocer la ciudad (pp. 207-238). Talca, Chile: Bifurcaciones.
Hack, G. (2000). Infrastructure and regional form. En Simmonds, R. y Hack, G. (Eds.), Global city regions: their emerging form (pp. 183-192). London and New York: Spion Press.
Hardin, G. (1968). Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162(Nov. 11), 1243-1248.
Harvey, D. (2012). El enigma del capital y las crisis del capitalismo. Madrid: Akai.
Harvey, D. (2014). Seventeen contradictions and the end of capitalism. Londres: Profile Books.
Heilbrun, J. (1987). Urban economics and public policy. Nueva York: St. Martin’s Press.
Indovina, F. (1990). La citta diffusa. Venecia: DAEST.
Kaufman, A. y Kaufman, J. (2018). Pseudoscience: The Conspiracy Against Science. MIT Press.
Kennedy, G. (2007). Adam Smith’s invisible hand: from metaphor to myth. En 34th Annual Meeting of the History of Economics Society, junio 8-11, 2007. George Mason University, Virginia, USA.
Lefebvre, H. (1978). El derecho a la ciudad. Barcelona: Península (1968).
Lefebvre, H. (1970). La revolución urbana. Madrid: Alianza.
Lefebvre, H. (2013). La producción del espacio. España: Capitán Swing (1974).
Marx, K. (1987). Miseria de la filosofía; respuesta a la filosofía de la miseria de Proudhon. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica (1846).
Merrifield, A. (2002). Metromarxism; a Marxist tale of the city. London: Routledge.
Ollman, B. (1976). Alienation: Marx’s Conception of Man in Capitalist Society. Cambridge University Press.
Richardson, H. (1973). The economics of urban size. Massachusetts: Heath, Lexington Books.
Sabatini, F., Rasse, A., Cáceres, G., Robles, M. S. y Trebilcock, M. P. (2017). Promotores inmobiliarios, gentrificación y segregación residencial en Santiago de Chile. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 79(2), 229-260. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iis.01882503p.2017.2.57662
Sahlins, M. (2011). La ilusión occidental de la naturaleza humana. México: FCE.
Sampson, R. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Sayer, A. (1992). Method in social science; a realist approach. London and New York: Routledge.
Sayer, A. (1995). Radical political economy; a critique. Reino Unido: Blackwell.
Schelling, T. (1978). Micromotives and Macrobehavior. Nueva York: W.W. Norton. Simmonds, R. y Hack, G. (Eds.) (2000). Global City Regions; Their Emerging Forms. London and New York: Spon Press.
Smith, N. (1987). Gentrification and the Rent Gap. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 77(3), 462-465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00171.x
Stiglitz, J. (2007). Making Globalization Work. Penguin.
Tilly, C. (2000). La desigualdad persistente. Buenos Aires: Manantial.
Wachsmuth, D. (2014). City as ideology: Reconciling the explosion of the city form with the tenacity of the city concept. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(1), 75-90.
Williams, R. (2001). El campo y la ciudad. Buenos Aires: Paidós (1973).
Wirth, L. (2005). El urbanismo como modo de vida (1934). Bifurcaciones, (2). Recuperado de http://www.bifurcaciones.cl/2005/03/louis-wirth-urbanismo/
Wright, F. L. (1932). The disappearing city. New York: W. F. Payson.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2020-12-02 (2)
- 2020-11-30 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Francisco Rafael Sabatini-Downey, Alejandra Rasse, María Paz Trebilcock, Ricardo Greene
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The content of articles which are published in each edition of Habitat Sustentable, is the exclusive responsibility of the author(s) and does not necessarily represent the thinking or compromise the opinion of University of the Bio-Bio.
The author(s) conserve their copyright and guarantee to the journal, the right of first publication of their work. This will simultaneously be subject to the Creative Commons Recognition License CC BY-SA, which allows others to share-copy, transform or create new materials from this work for non-commercial purposes, as long as they recognize authorship and the first publication in this journal, and its new creations are under a license with the same terms.
